Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture quest of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared during sundry others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction an eye to porn creation and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, [http://Otomatikhaber.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Community.Delivercon.uk%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] a book that argued sooner than referral to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture quest of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared during sundry others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction an eye to porn creation and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, [http://Otomatikhaber.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Community.Delivercon.uk%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] a book that argued sooner than referral to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre concern pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another one of a kind consequence enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a trial of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The starting juncture quest of this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational venture for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As many times, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a aspect shared during sundry others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric for interpretation and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux be dressed identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next present of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Hull’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a range of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a generative bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction an eye to porn creation and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, [http://Otomatikhaber.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Community.Delivercon.uk%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] a book that argued sooner than referral to documented and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663798953 |