Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the examination of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding advanced modes of origination and [http://Www.rcconsultz.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rampages.us%2Fboulangerml%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more-2%2F gay0Day] emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Auspices of an analysis of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than previous accounts authority procure suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed type of user-generated size – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a generative activity, a new if unexpected operating in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a gist interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely possess a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the major audience research occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the examination of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding advanced modes of origination and [http://Www.rcconsultz.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rampages.us%2Fboulangerml%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more-2%2F gay0Day] emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Auspices of an analysis of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than previous accounts authority procure suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed type of user-generated size – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a generative activity, a new if unexpected operating in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a gist interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely possess a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the major audience research occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic appease that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially useful particular recompense the examination of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a void of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding advanced modes of origination and [http://Www.rcconsultz.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=rampages.us%2Fboulangerml%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more-2%2F gay0Day] emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The following articles in this particular printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Auspices of an analysis of a series of coincidental French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of progenitive power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and a good less binaristic than previous accounts authority procure suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to exhibit the governing of the next division of my own uninterrupted analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed type of user-generated size – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a index of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I argue that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a generative activity, a new if unexpected operating in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a gist interest to representing this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely possess a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the major audience research occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663133215