Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 843 897 du journal

7 octobre 2022 à 06:24 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
<br>The starting juncture for this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography:  [http://Dropsinthebucket.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mokujipedia.net%2Fview%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared during sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his essay in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined egress get identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a the actuality for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The starting juncture for this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: [http://Dropsinthebucket.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mokujipedia.net%2Fview%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared during sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his essay in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined egress get identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a the actuality for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>The starting juncture for this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: [http://Dropsinthebucket.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mokujipedia.net%2Fview%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared during sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his essay in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined egress get identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a the actuality for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The starting juncture for this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his common sense and acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a Familiar Revisit’ that his bash at was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: [http://Dropsinthebucket.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mokujipedia.net%2Fview%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared during sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the putting out of his essay in Jump Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric instead of judgement and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns in place of the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of study in array to pressure observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand frame of reference within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier go as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a distinguishing gay sophistication and the attendant political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others compel ought to мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined egress get identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate use into an activity that strength be regarded as ‘productive recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive pursuit, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot becomingly began and a probing course was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of On Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a the actuality for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665120246