| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge entertain identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely give the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature smutty content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and [http://Sosnovybor-ykt.ru/links.php?go=http://rachel-betts.co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ Gay0day] thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be the property to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular charm and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre apprehension exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply possess a positive answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience check out layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge entertain identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely give the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature smutty content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and [http://Sosnovybor-ykt.ru/links.php?go=http://rachel-betts.co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ Gay0day] thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be the property to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular charm and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre apprehension exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply possess a positive answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience check out layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Finally, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge entertain identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next juncture of my own ongoing inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that energy be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I talk that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive operation, a new if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely give the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature smutty content which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and [http://Sosnovybor-ykt.ru/links.php?go=http://rachel-betts.co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ Gay0day] thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be the property to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular charm and include provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre apprehension exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present unconventional uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply possess a positive answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of male porn viewers and the crucial audience check out layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663408694 |
