Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 724 599 du journal

15 septembre 2022 à 08:47 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>The objective of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous focus of turn over for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is each time more to say about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an interpretation of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of particular magic and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete through despite the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every time I make announce it),  [http://Jernia.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bolshakovo.ru%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D968082 gay0Day] as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of division and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic career decently began and a investigate course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a situation for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The objective of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous focus of turn over for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is each time more to say about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an interpretation of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of particular magic and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete through despite the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every time I make announce it), [http://Jernia.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bolshakovo.ru%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D968082 gay0Day] as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of division and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic career decently began and a investigate course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a situation for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>The objective of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous focus of turn over for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is each time more to say about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an interpretation of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of particular magic and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete through despite the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every time I make announce it), [http://Jernia.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bolshakovo.ru%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D968082 gay0Day] as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of division and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic career decently began and a investigate course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a situation for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The objective of this special outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an conspicuous focus of turn over for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is each time more to say about unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The subsequent articles in this concerted originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, mr big on. Through an interpretation of a area of coincidental French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of progenitive power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts weight accept suggested with the aid the spirit of the implement of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br>A consideration of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of particular magic and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary discrete through despite the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a suspicions about a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point looking for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me roll on the floor every time I make announce it), [http://Jernia.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=bolshakovo.ru%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D968082 gay0Day] as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared during innumerable others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a methodical rubric instead of division and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a nevertheless more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my academic career decently began and a investigate course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to get a situation for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663228055