Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
NellyBevan88
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
0
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Russian TV Says Nuclear Strike apos;more Probable apos; Than Losing In Ukraine
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Russian TV Says Nuclear Strike apos;more Probable apos; Than Losing In Ukraine
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
Vladimir will launch an all-out on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, 's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.<br>Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.<br>'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts.<br><br>I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader. <br>'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.<br>'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'<br>Simonyan's calm imagining of [https://www.answers.com/search?q=nuclear%20holocaust nuclear holocaust] is just the latest threat issued from the top levels of the Russian state, after fellow propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, [https://imgur.com/hot?q=foreign%20minister foreign minister] Sergei Lavrov, and Putin himself [https://en.search.wordpress.com/?q=issued%20threats issued threats] in the last 48 hours.<br>The US and [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] UK have dismissed such rhetoric as bluster but the increasing frequency of the threats coupled with the failures of Russia's military will raise fears that a Cold War-style standoff is now a realistic possibility before the war in Ukraine ends.<br>It comes after Russia successfully test-launched its latest [https://www.google.com/search?q=nuclear%20missile&btnI=lucky nuclear missile] - Sarmat 2 - last week, with Putin boasting it can strike targets anywhere on earth and cannot be stopped by any current missile defences. <br> Margarita Simonyan told Russian state TV last night that the idea of nuclear war is 'more probable' than the idea that Putin will allow Russia to be defeated in Ukraine<br> Russia has steppe up its nuclear threats to the West ever since testing its new Sarmat 2 missile last week (pictured), which Putin boasted is unstoppable by any current defences<br>Lavrov was the first to raise the nuclear threat in an interview on Russian state TV late Tuesday, when he was asked whether the current standoff between east and west could be compared to the Cuban missile crisis at the height of the Cold War.<br>The foreign minister responded that the current situation is more dangerous, because the weapons involved are more powerful, the controls on them more lax, and communication between the two sides is non-existent.<br>'During the Cuban Missile Crisis there were not many "written" rules.<br><br>But the rules of conduct were clear enough. <br>'Moscow understood how Washington was behaving. Washington understood how Moscow was behaving. Now there are few rules left,' he said.<br>Asked directly about the threat of nuclear war, he added: 'The risks are very significant.
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ - +Vladimir will launch an all-out on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, 's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.<br>Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.<br>'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts.<br><br>I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader. <br>'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.<br>'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'<br>Simonyan's calm imagining of [https://www.answers.com/search?q=nuclear%20holocaust nuclear holocaust] is just the latest threat issued from the top levels of the Russian state, after fellow propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, [https://imgur.com/hot?q=foreign%20minister foreign minister] Sergei Lavrov, and Putin himself [https://en.search.wordpress.com/?q=issued%20threats issued threats] in the last 48 hours.<br>The US and [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] UK have dismissed such rhetoric as bluster but the increasing frequency of the threats coupled with the failures of Russia's military will raise fears that a Cold War-style standoff is now a realistic possibility before the war in Ukraine ends.<br>It comes after Russia successfully test-launched its latest [https://www.google.com/search?q=nuclear%20missile&btnI=lucky nuclear missile] - Sarmat 2 - last week, with Putin boasting it can strike targets anywhere on earth and cannot be stopped by any current missile defences. <br> Margarita Simonyan told Russian state TV last night that the idea of nuclear war is 'more probable' than the idea that Putin will allow Russia to be defeated in Ukraine<br> Russia has steppe up its nuclear threats to the West ever since testing its new Sarmat 2 missile last week (pictured), which Putin boasted is unstoppable by any current defences<br>Lavrov was the first to raise the nuclear threat in an interview on Russian state TV late Tuesday, when he was asked whether the current standoff between east and west could be compared to the Cuban missile crisis at the height of the Cold War.<br>The foreign minister responded that the current situation is more dangerous, because the weapons involved are more powerful, the controls on them more lax, and communication between the two sides is non-existent.<br>'During the Cuban Missile Crisis there were not many "written" rules.<br><br>But the rules of conduct were clear enough. <br>'Moscow understood how Washington was behaving. Washington understood how Moscow was behaving. Now there are few rules left,' he said.<br>Asked directly about the threat of nuclear war, he added: 'The risks are very significant.
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
Vladimir will launch an all-out on the West rather than accept defeat in Ukraine, 's chief propagandists have declared, in just the latest chilling threat coming from Moscow.<br>Margarita Simonyan, editor of state broadcaster and one of the Kremlin's highest-profile mouthpieces, declared on TV last night that the idea of Putin pressing the red button is 'more probable' than the idea that he will allow Russia to lose the war.<br>'Either we lose in Ukraine,' she said, 'or the Third World War starts.<br><br>I think World War Three is more realistic, knowing us, knowing our leader. <br>'The most incredible outcome, that all this will end with a nuclear strike, seems more probable to me than the other course of events.<br>'This is to my horror on one hand,' she told a panel of experts shifting nervously in their seats, 'but on the other hand, it is what it is. We will go to heaven, while they will simply croak... We're all going to die someday.'<br>Simonyan's calm imagining of [https://www.answers.com/search?q=nuclear%20holocaust nuclear holocaust] is just the latest threat issued from the top levels of the Russian state, after fellow propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, [https://imgur.com/hot?q=foreign%20minister foreign minister] Sergei Lavrov, and Putin himself [https://en.search.wordpress.com/?q=issued%20threats issued threats] in the last 48 hours.<br>The US and [https://www.rtnewstoday.com/ RT News Today] UK have dismissed such rhetoric as bluster but the increasing frequency of the threats coupled with the failures of Russia's military will raise fears that a Cold War-style standoff is now a realistic possibility before the war in Ukraine ends.<br>It comes after Russia successfully test-launched its latest [https://www.google.com/search?q=nuclear%20missile&btnI=lucky nuclear missile] - Sarmat 2 - last week, with Putin boasting it can strike targets anywhere on earth and cannot be stopped by any current missile defences. <br> Margarita Simonyan told Russian state TV last night that the idea of nuclear war is 'more probable' than the idea that Putin will allow Russia to be defeated in Ukraine<br> Russia has steppe up its nuclear threats to the West ever since testing its new Sarmat 2 missile last week (pictured), which Putin boasted is unstoppable by any current defences<br>Lavrov was the first to raise the nuclear threat in an interview on Russian state TV late Tuesday, when he was asked whether the current standoff between east and west could be compared to the Cuban missile crisis at the height of the Cold War.<br>The foreign minister responded that the current situation is more dangerous, because the weapons involved are more powerful, the controls on them more lax, and communication between the two sides is non-existent.<br>'During the Cuban Missile Crisis there were not many "written" rules.<br><br>But the rules of conduct were clear enough. <br>'Moscow understood how Washington was behaving. Washington understood how Moscow was behaving. Now there are few rules left,' he said.<br>Asked directly about the threat of nuclear war, he added: 'The risks are very significant.
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1667487998