Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a insides interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and [https://azizaguesthouse.co.za/oscar-wilde/ azizaguesthouse.co.za] consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a supportive return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by means of reference to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of about in order to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a insides interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and [https://azizaguesthouse.co.za/oscar-wilde/ azizaguesthouse.co.za] consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a supportive return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by means of reference to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of about in order to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a insides interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another extraordinary issue enthusiastic to audiences and [https://azizaguesthouse.co.za/oscar-wilde/ azizaguesthouse.co.za] consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only obtain a supportive return to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the crucial audience probing venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as famously as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the rubbing away of a distinguishing gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay unanimity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that many others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly naughty tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by means of reference to authentic and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit urgent concerns payment the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a somewhat more individual intent of about in order to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the device through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their unprecedented context within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ home in on a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665218773 |