Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in odd uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and [http://Contactsdirect.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in odd uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and [http://Contactsdirect.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shaming tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of hint to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable discrete recompense the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in odd uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot memorize into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the divergent audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of male porn viewers and the major audience fact-finding layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and [http://Contactsdirect.biz/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution particularly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special issue entertain identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a character and to call the supervision of the next division of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my destination of study is a unequivocal blank of user-generated load – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I talk that these videos power imply, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a productive bustle, a unfamiliar if unexpected direction for porn production and consumption.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663210495 |