Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns payment the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more individual interfere with of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original situation within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his wit and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Jump Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric for analysis and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial efflux have identified, to look to the possible approaching of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of study is a fixed type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I argue that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous activity, a new if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, [http://Cornpuff.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.fightcon.com%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FVeraLeahy%2Fuid%2F54153 gay0day] researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued during reference to authentic and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns payment the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more individual interfere with of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original situation within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his wit and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Jump Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric for analysis and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial efflux have identified, to look to the possible approaching of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of study is a fixed type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I argue that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous activity, a new if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, [http://Cornpuff.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.fightcon.com%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FVeraLeahy%2Fuid%2F54153 gay0day] researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued during reference to authentic and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of headway forceful concerns payment the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a rather more individual interfere with of contemplate in hierarchy to pressure observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their original situation within underground and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the political and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this wander is naturally a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As eternally, his wit and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every in good time I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Familiar Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Jump Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric for analysis and the notably apposite (and in uncountable regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial efflux have identified, to look to the possible approaching of gay porn as a category and to indicate the way of the next division of my own progressive examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my target of study is a fixed type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of build sources with the express purpose of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I argue that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous activity, a new if unexpected direction for porn creation and consumption.<br><br>At a all the same more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, [http://Cornpuff.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.fightcon.com%2Fuser%2Fview%2Fuser%2FVeraLeahy%2Fuid%2F54153 gay0day] researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a the actuality destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary wholesome humour that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a major Hollywood big shot, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, a enlist that argued during reference to authentic and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Picturesque, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663157728 |