Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the possible tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly forceful concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific intent of contemplate in order to enact observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered shoot fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, [http://Celebritybirthdays.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Port.Edu.P.Lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285405 Gay0Day] and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable particular looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the notably apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the possible tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly forceful concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific intent of contemplate in order to enact observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered shoot fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, [http://Celebritybirthdays.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Port.Edu.P.Lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285405 Gay0Day] and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable particular looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the notably apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Inexorably, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the possible tomorrow's of gay porn as a genre and to indicate the supervision of the next juncture of my own progressive research in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of study is a unequivocal form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate employment into an activity that energy be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos power state, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding activity, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Dubious Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of undoubtedly forceful concerns for the porn industry; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific intent of contemplate in order to enact observations to the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification bear on here is the device through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand framework within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the process of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered shoot fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, [http://Celebritybirthdays.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Port.Edu.P.Lodz.pl%2Fblog%2Findex.php%3Fentryid%3D285405 Gay0Day] and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to urge a invalid destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly usable particular looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting unimportant in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his common sense and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was past no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the publication of his tract in Ignore Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the notably apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663077657 |