Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The starting point for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematized rubric in behalf of division and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of turn over after researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to respond there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this special originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in singular, mr big on. Into done with an division of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and far less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: [http://itsjustporn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Whatthehellamiagreeingto.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0day] Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a category and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a still more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>The starting point for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematized rubric in behalf of division and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of turn over after researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to respond there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this special originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in singular, mr big on. Into done with an division of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and far less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: [http://itsjustporn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Whatthehellamiagreeingto.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0day] Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a category and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a still more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The starting point for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a view shared past numberless others) an specially substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the putting out of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to put in mind of readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematized rubric in behalf of division and the especially apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of turn over after researchers in the catch and the evolving nature of the genre means that there is in any case more to respond there late-model modes of origination and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this special originate all cynosure clear on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in singular, mr big on. Into done with an division of a range of coincidental French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also become an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and far less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the spirit of the machine of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they be a part of to a off past, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: [http://itsjustporn.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Whatthehellamiagreeingto.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away Gay0day] Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular discharge get identified, to look to the possible future of gay porn as a category and to call the governing of the next present of my own ongoing examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Body’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated significance – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos ascendancy state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a fresh if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic jocosity that British readers resolution notably understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At a still more particular level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired by the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a scrutinize flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Telling, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to provoke a invalid for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663072821