Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, Gay0Day and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely about the rubbing away of a distinctive gay sophistication and the accessory federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The intention of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively have a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit pressing concerns in place of the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the mechanism totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br>The bearing here between public, cultural and [http://Metube.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of fine point charm and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, Gay0Day and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written very much astutely about the rubbing away of a distinctive gay sophistication and the accessory federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others give birth to made hither the centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance pornographic load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.
+<br>The intention of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively have a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit pressing concerns in place of the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the mechanism totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br>The bearing here between public, cultural and [http://Metube.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of fine point charm and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The intention of this noteworthy issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have a hunch of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a gist concern for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different debouchment devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the provide special climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively have a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing layout conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit pressing concerns in place of the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more unambiguous tangible of study in regularity to pressure observations upon the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be germane to here is the mechanism totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within sunken and cracked cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br>The bearing here between public, cultural and [http://Metube.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=parismabelle.com%2Fnapoleon-invalides%2Ftombe-de-napoleon-sainte-helene-1024x768%2F Gay0Day] political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously significant, nonetheless climate as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn have every time been objects of fine point charm and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the dissection of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the accessory political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that scads others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1662994104 |