Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | TrudiCheatham5 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | The Art Of Erotic Pleasure |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | The Art Of Erotic Pleasure |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The debate about the relation between erotic pleasure and aesthetic appeal has lasted well into the 20th and 21st centuries. The idea that the two are fundamentally incompatible has been a persistent theme throughout history. Yet the man on the street is surprisingly receptive to works of art that appeal to his sexual and sensual emotions. In fact, the erotic payoff is often greater when the erotic is self-imagined.<br><br>In the United States, erotic literature has become more mainstream, largely because women are more receptive to the visual imagery of sexual arousal than men. But this isn't true everywhere. Some countries, such as France, have a more liberal definition of what constitutes [https://www.cbsnews.com/search/?q=erotic%20material erotic material] than others, so it may be perfectly acceptable in that country to read an erotic book. And while men are generally more willing to pay for a sexually explicit book, women are not so willing to pay for it.<br><br>For example, a person unfamiliar with the Christian Bible story may take a crucifixion painting as a sado-masochistic act. But Tintoretto's Crucifixion is not a work of erotic art. This painting, [https://sevgilimistanbul.com/ sevgilimistanbul.com] however, is a beautiful representation of the human condition. And if an artist is truly in love with their subject, they should not paint them as anything less than a beautiful woman.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+<br>The debate about the relation between erotic pleasure and aesthetic appeal has lasted well into the 20th and 21st centuries. The idea that the two are fundamentally incompatible has been a persistent theme throughout history. Yet the man on the street is surprisingly receptive to works of art that appeal to his sexual and sensual emotions. In fact, the erotic payoff is often greater when the erotic is self-imagined.<br><br>In the United States, erotic literature has become more mainstream, largely because women are more receptive to the visual imagery of sexual arousal than men. But this isn't true everywhere. Some countries, such as France, have a more liberal definition of what constitutes [https://www.cbsnews.com/search/?q=erotic%20material erotic material] than others, so it may be perfectly acceptable in that country to read an erotic book. And while men are generally more willing to pay for a sexually explicit book, women are not so willing to pay for it.<br><br>For example, a person unfamiliar with the Christian Bible story may take a crucifixion painting as a sado-masochistic act. But Tintoretto's Crucifixion is not a work of erotic art. This painting, [https://sevgilimistanbul.com/ sevgilimistanbul.com] however, is a beautiful representation of the human condition. And if an artist is truly in love with their subject, they should not paint them as anything less than a beautiful woman.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The debate about the relation between erotic pleasure and aesthetic appeal has lasted well into the 20th and 21st centuries. The idea that the two are fundamentally incompatible has been a persistent theme throughout history. Yet the man on the street is surprisingly receptive to works of art that appeal to his sexual and sensual emotions. In fact, the erotic payoff is often greater when the erotic is self-imagined.<br><br>In the United States, erotic literature has become more mainstream, largely because women are more receptive to the visual imagery of sexual arousal than men. But this isn't true everywhere. Some countries, such as France, have a more liberal definition of what constitutes [https://www.cbsnews.com/search/?q=erotic%20material erotic material] than others, so it may be perfectly acceptable in that country to read an erotic book. And while men are generally more willing to pay for a sexually explicit book, women are not so willing to pay for it.<br><br>For example, a person unfamiliar with the Christian Bible story may take a crucifixion painting as a sado-masochistic act. But Tintoretto's Crucifixion is not a work of erotic art. This painting, [https://sevgilimistanbul.com/ sevgilimistanbul.com] however, is a beautiful representation of the human condition. And if an artist is truly in love with their subject, they should not paint them as anything less than a beautiful woman.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1653432281 |
