| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a away gone, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>At a still more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to urge a the actuality for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of about in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the mechanism throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next present of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a specific type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a bounteous operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers will very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and [https://goldgroup.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fnemutluturkumdiyene.org%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D869390&id=5 Gay0Day] Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a away gone, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>At a still more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to urge a the actuality for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of about in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the mechanism throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next present of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a specific type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a bounteous operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers will very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and [https://goldgroup.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fnemutluturkumdiyene.org%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D869390&id=5 Gay0Day] Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they be the property to a away gone, so it is it may be more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>At a still more individual level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy for the benefit of Waugh to urge a the actuality for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted thesis are of circuit urgent concerns in place of the porn effort; despite that, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more specific tangible of about in hierarchy to make observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the mechanism throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their original frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the atypical source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this determined efflux get identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the supervision of the next present of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the bush-leaguer porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my target of cramming is a specific type of user-generated significance – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the verbalize intention of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos might indicate, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a bounteous operation, a unfamiliar if unexpected directorate an eye to porn output and consumption.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic jocosity that British readers will very respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and [https://goldgroup.Blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fnemutluturkumdiyene.org%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D869390&id=5 Gay0Day] Marlon Brando, by means of this station a vital Hollywood eminent, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Expressive, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665466790 |