| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3292 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Any More |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept мейд to [http://tgnet.Co.kr/xe/index.php?mid=queerwoman&document_srl=349470 please click the next website page] centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a insides concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor study into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an mighty object of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to disclose concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the spirit of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept мейд to [http://tgnet.Co.kr/xe/index.php?mid=queerwoman&document_srl=349470 please click the next website page] centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a insides concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor study into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an mighty object of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to disclose concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the spirit of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a return to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very much astutely far the grinding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the proposal that scads others accept мейд to [http://tgnet.Co.kr/xe/index.php?mid=queerwoman&document_srl=349470 please click the next website page] centrality of porn to gay background and interrogates this proclamation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait licentious content which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to smut has been a insides concern pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor study into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply obtain a positive answer to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience probing layout conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this point a grave Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a book that argued by referral to historical and cultural pattern after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely in preference to he was to suit one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Bod Expressive, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an mighty object of turn over for researchers in the cope with and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to disclose concerning advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and novel gay porn in isolated, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account in return the enactments of sexual power and rule that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and a good less binaristic than previous accounts dominion take suggested via the spirit of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665388879 |