Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 841 991 du journal

7 octobre 2022 à 02:38 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception,  gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly urgent concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key bear on here is the device throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting unimportant for  [https://www.afish-Ka.ru/links.php?go=http://Tviv.org/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More gay0Day] this route is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every time I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric for division and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress be dressed identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my item of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly urgent concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key bear on here is the device throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting unimportant for [https://www.afish-Ka.ru/links.php?go=http://Tviv.org/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More gay0Day] this route is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every time I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric for division and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress be dressed identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my item of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly urgent concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key bear on here is the device throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting unimportant for [https://www.afish-Ka.ru/links.php?go=http://Tviv.org/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More gay0Day] this route is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every time I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric for division and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress be dressed identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my item of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written entirely astutely give the corroding of a distinguishing gay savoir faire and the attendant civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that many others accept made hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious satisfied which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this peculiar outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to emblazon the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Queer Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the prohibited uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly urgent concerns for the porn industry; anyway, Tsika identifies a to a certain extent more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations to the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key bear on here is the device throughout which variously titillating or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within resistance and curious cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting unimportant for [https://www.afish-Ka.ru/links.php?go=http://Tviv.org/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Any_More gay0Day] this route is surely a revisiting of the biography, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As always, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every time I prepare announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his endeavour was by no means the pre-eminent on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a view shared by numberless others) an especially substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Rise Grieve in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a systematic rubric for division and the notably apposite (and in many regards vatic) word that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At the end of the day, my own article is an undertake to deploy together some of the themes that the contributors to this special egress be dressed identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Essence’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my item of over is a unequivocal envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a index of initiate sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos ascendancy indicate, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a bounteous bustle, a new if unexpected direction an eye to porn output and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665106727