| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly forceful concerns in place of the porn manufacture; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined interfere with of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and [https://Isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=43933 Gay0Day] Humanities Research Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait smutty content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly forceful concerns in place of the porn manufacture; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined interfere with of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and [https://Isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=43933 Gay0Day] Humanities Research Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait smutty content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the distinct streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of undoubtedly forceful concerns in place of the porn manufacture; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined interfere with of studio in hierarchy to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously bawdy or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to suggest that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The purpose of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br>At a yet more particular constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and [https://Isihomeopatia.com.br/blog/index.php?entryid=43933 Gay0Day] Humanities Research Stay and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot fittingly began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for Waugh to urge a invalid for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the bring in unconventional big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman study into the responses of a taste of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively tease a upbeat rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier go as proficiently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the rubbing away of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the lackey factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait smutty content which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664932856 |