Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 745 439 du journal

22 septembre 2022 à 02:54 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
The bearing here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a aspect shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his effort in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and national frame of reference – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures prepare a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond concerning unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, [https://Ww.deixe-tip.cz/scripts/redir.php?url=Odolbodol.shop%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D2822653 Gay0day] and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
The bearing here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a aspect shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his effort in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and national frame of reference – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures prepare a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond concerning unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, [https://Ww.deixe-tip.cz/scripts/redir.php?url=Odolbodol.shop%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D2822653 Gay0day] and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +The bearing here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a aspect shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his effort in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and national frame of reference – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures prepare a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond concerning unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, [https://Ww.deixe-tip.cz/scripts/redir.php?url=Odolbodol.shop%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D2822653 Gay0day] and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
The bearing here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a reserved gone, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is at once over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a primary Hollywood big shot, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first place published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of express charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose congruence has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a routine of issues about the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The starting point for this odyssey is to be sure a revisiting of the last, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provide his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was past no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my view (and this is a aspect shared by numberless others) an primarily worthy intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the set of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his effort in Rise Cut in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of judgement and the uniquely apposite (and in diverse regards prophetic) criticism that gay porn does not be present in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this special outflow is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars engage with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and national frame of reference – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures prepare a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty goal of about looking for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond concerning unfledged modes of formation and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Restrain the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, [https://Ww.deixe-tip.cz/scripts/redir.php?url=Odolbodol.shop%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D2822653 Gay0day] and contemporary gay porn in particular, mr big on. Through an analysis of a range of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than whilom accounts might accept suggested from one end to the other the presence of the implement of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663811667