Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 717 591 du journal

13 septembre 2022 à 20:39 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and  gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>The joint here between public, cultural and state changes and  [http://Ymcasummercamp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-Betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F their explanation] developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of about looking for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this special originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to indicate the direction of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of study is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative activity, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The joint here between public, cultural and state changes and [http://Ymcasummercamp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-Betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F their explanation] developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of about looking for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this special originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to indicate the direction of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of study is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative activity, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>The joint here between public, cultural and state changes and [http://Ymcasummercamp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-Betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F their explanation] developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of about looking for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this special originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to indicate the direction of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of study is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative activity, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The joint here between public, cultural and state changes and [http://Ymcasummercamp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Rachel-Betts.Co.uk%2F2016%2F05%2Fmake-it-clean-and-simple%2F their explanation] developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is at once during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a centre interest to for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in special issue, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a representational of largely Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply obtain a upbeat response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience fact-finding project conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The objective of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important destination of about looking for researchers in the field and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is in any case more to say there late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this special originate all core on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also mature an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an attempt to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge get identified, to look to the possible days of gay porn as a category and to indicate the direction of the next division of my own unbroken inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Jargon Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my object of study is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a range of build sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate purchase into an vocation that energy be regarded as ‘bountiful respite’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance state, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a generative activity, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663094385