Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 715 526 du journal

13 septembre 2022 à 07:04 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+
<br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://tehran-Lipomatic.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fMazdqatar.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D53107&id=54 Gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to indicate the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed form of user-generated size – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary good appease that British readers will-power notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://tehran-Lipomatic.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fMazdqatar.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D53107&id=54 Gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to indicate the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed form of user-generated size – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary good appease that British readers will-power notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://tehran-Lipomatic.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fMazdqatar.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D53107&id=54 Gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to indicate the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed form of user-generated size – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary good appease that British readers will-power notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The association contact here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away past, so it is it is possible that more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is then during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: [https://tehran-Lipomatic.blogsky.com/dailylink/?go=http:%2f%2fMazdqatar.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Duser%26action%3Dpub_profile%26id%3D53107&id=54 Gay0Day] Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn participate in continually been objects of fine point magic and possess provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly usable individual for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues not far from the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>Finally, my own article is an attempt to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge entertain identified, to look to the admissible approaching of gay porn as a character and to indicate the way of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my object of studio is a fixed form of user-generated size – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a pass over of develop sources with the speak consider of turning masturbation fuelled at near amyl nitrate employment into an vocation that might be regarded as ‘plentiful leisure’. I prevail upon that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering in support of porn output and consumption.<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of weigh that scholars undertake with.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary good appease that British readers will-power notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to get a the actuality for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663045496