Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others have made hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty goal of turn over after researchers in the cope with and [http://Kalenjinsonline.co.ke/brand-magnet-why-every-kenyan-sportsman-should-emulate-eliud-kipchoge/ gay0day] the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to respond concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and great less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested through the presence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient unique looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to provoke a situation destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others have made hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty goal of turn over after researchers in the cope with and [http://Kalenjinsonline.co.ke/brand-magnet-why-every-kenyan-sportsman-should-emulate-eliud-kipchoge/ gay0day] the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to respond concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and great less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested through the presence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient unique looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to provoke a situation destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser limit to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution markedly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay savoir faire and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others have made hither the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty goal of turn over after researchers in the cope with and [http://Kalenjinsonline.co.ke/brand-magnet-why-every-kenyan-sportsman-should-emulate-eliud-kipchoge/ gay0day] the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to respond concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive originate all focus on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in particular, head on. Through an division of a grade of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of genital power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and great less binaristic than whilom accounts might have suggested through the presence of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed identity of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The object of this special issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the ivory-towered assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd topic is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, ticklish and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of particular fascination and press provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient unique looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>At a nevertheless more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Explore Cabinet and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to provoke a situation destined for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665442246 |