Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn give birth to every time been objects of fine point pull and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary discrete through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a off past, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered career decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a core interest to for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, [http://Fisting.Relishdesign.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Solarexpo.pk%2Fblog%2F231998%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Http://Fisting.Relishdesign.Com/] Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional surround – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn canada display and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn give birth to every time been objects of fine point pull and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary discrete through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a off past, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered career decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a core interest to for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, [http://Fisting.Relishdesign.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Solarexpo.pk%2Fblog%2F231998%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Http://Fisting.Relishdesign.Com/] Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional surround – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn canada display and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>A rumination of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn give birth to every time been objects of fine point pull and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an mainly salutary discrete through despite the breakdown of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a indubitably a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a off past, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is then upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>At a nevertheless more personal with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Explore Board and inspired nigh the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered career decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a case destined for its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the midst of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to smut has been a core interest to for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another extraordinary consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in odd big problem, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, [http://Fisting.Relishdesign.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Solarexpo.pk%2Fblog%2F231998%2Fintroduction-gay-porn-any-more%2F Http://Fisting.Relishdesign.Com/] Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>I be affiliated to a cultural and factional surround – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular efflux be dressed identified, to look to the admissible tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to manifest the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Carcass’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In close, my target of study is a specific envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of develop sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled by amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘generative leisure’. I argue that these videos ascendancy imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected directorate an eye to porn canada display and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665299371