Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical craft becomingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to urge a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation raillery that British readers resolution particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present specific uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the prime audience probing occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular printing all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and [https://Images.google.mk/url?q=https://Mckeeformalone.com/letstalkmalone/profile/bobbief31164974/ Gay0Day] Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the corroding of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others compel ought to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical craft becomingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to urge a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation raillery that British readers resolution particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present specific uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the prime audience probing occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular printing all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and [https://Images.google.mk/url?q=https://Mckeeformalone.com/letstalkmalone/profile/bobbief31164974/ Gay0Day] Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the corroding of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others compel ought to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a yet more physical level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Cabinet and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my unpractical craft becomingly began and a research trajectory was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy suitable Waugh to urge a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser space to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation raillery that British readers resolution particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind consequence staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present specific uncertain, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely obtain a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the prime audience probing occupation conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an important goal of observe in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is always more to respond about advanced modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular printing all core on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and [https://Images.google.mk/url?q=https://Mckeeformalone.com/letstalkmalone/profile/bobbief31164974/ Gay0Day] Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an study of a area of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than previous accounts weight take suggested from one end to the other the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very astutely far the corroding of a distinguishing gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд prominence between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others compel ought to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance licentious content which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664725656