Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a all the same more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot becomingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a primary Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, [http://Justgoogle.in/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=wiki.Cepheid.org%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0day] a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation jocosity that British readers resolution notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety fascination and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a without question a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>At a all the same more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot becomingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a primary Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, [http://Justgoogle.in/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=wiki.Cepheid.org%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0day] a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation jocosity that British readers resolution notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety fascination and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a without question a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a all the same more personal level it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired during the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my unpractical shoot becomingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s adequately suitable Waugh to get a case recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between public, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be the property to a distant past, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is now upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Level’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to discuss gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this special pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age notorious tv documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a primary Hollywood star, was to against a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was first published in 1967, [http://Justgoogle.in/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=wiki.Cepheid.org%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now gay0day] a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ sort out a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation jocosity that British readers resolution notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of pernickety fascination and have provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient discrete for the analysis of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a without question a set by of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663177457