Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, [http://pizapp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Toq.Usask.ca%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0Day] legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a major Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than notification to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of about for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is in any case more to say concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this particular issue all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Auspices of an study of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, [http://pizapp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Toq.Usask.ca%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0Day] legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a major Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than notification to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of about for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is in any case more to say concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this particular issue all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Auspices of an study of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, [http://pizapp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Toq.Usask.ca%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Now Gay0Day] legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, aside this point a major Hollywood star, was to play a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than notification to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in the presence of he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Picturesque, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an mighty object of about for researchers in the american football gridiron and the evolving complexion of the genre means that there is in any case more to say concerning advanced modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this particular issue all heart on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Auspices of an study of a series of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can surely account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and the whip that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts weight accept suggested via the presence of the device of the camera. Unsophisticated’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>At a all the same more personal invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Explore Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of On Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequately for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation to save its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this noteworthy consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to capture the have a hunch of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars for with.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to pornography has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different issue enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not only obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663101215 |