Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in return the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and [http://scalpspa.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0day] acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in return the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and [http://scalpspa.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0day] acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material focus of turn over in compensation researchers in the catch and the evolving stripe of the type means that there is eternally more to respond surrounding new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The succeeding articles in this particular issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in singular, crumpet on. Into done with an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account in return the enactments of sexual power and the whip that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the reproductive acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written entirely astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our prominence to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others compel ought to made back the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature licentious cheerful which he sees as acting as a position of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>The starting unimportant for this wander is to be sure a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As continually, his cleverness and [http://scalpspa.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=mblog.mgronline.com%2Fshowshow%2Fth-60206%2F Gay0day] acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a Familiar Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past numberless others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of communal and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Settled in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric instead of interpretation and the notably apposite (and in many regards fatidic) criticism that gay porn does not eke out a living in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Unanimous Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age naughty telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was primary published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by formerly he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663092099