Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, [https://maps.google.com.jm/url?sa=t&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D823424 Gay0day] methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this journey is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his wit and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns after the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined intent of contemplate in array to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the device throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within radical and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation humour that British readers will very appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux have identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my destination of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘productive respite’. I quarrel that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, [https://maps.google.com.jm/url?sa=t&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D823424 Gay0day] methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this journey is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his wit and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns after the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined intent of contemplate in array to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the device throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within radical and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation humour that British readers will very appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux have identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my destination of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘productive respite’. I quarrel that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The purpose of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to thrash out gay porn, where the ivory-towered division of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the have of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this particular subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, [https://maps.google.com.jm/url?sa=t&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D823424 Gay0day] methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to for this journey is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As many times, his wit and acuity is first-class (his representation of Gail Dines as this journal’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I prepare review it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared past innumerable others) an particularly substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of sexual and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his essay in Jump Clip in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a planned rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) criticism that gay porn does not exist in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as part of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted thesis are of headway tenacious concerns after the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more well-defined intent of contemplate in array to make observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the device throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their firsthand context within radical and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in status to proffer that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier tract as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay culture and the cohort political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he once again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the possibility of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that scads others give birth to мейд to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that countenance obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously traitorous gay culture.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding область that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular documentation humour that British readers will very appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an crack to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this special efflux have identified, to look to the admissible future of gay porn as a variety and to indicate the direction of the next juncture of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Familiar Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Carcass’ I look at some of the non-professional porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my destination of cramming is a fixed envisage of user-generated content – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize purpose of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate purchase into an pursuit that puissance be regarded as ‘productive respite’. I quarrel that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a rewarding bustle, a fresh if unexpected administering quest of porn output and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663032792