Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | DeniceMurnin897 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 0 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Why You Need A Ky |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Why You Need A Ky |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br> While most shoes designed for flat feet offer significant cushioning and arch support, some don't always provide the level of tread necessary for running on unpredictable terrain. Despite the new characters and a setting far from the Ghostbusters’ signature terrain of New York City, Ghostbusters: Afterlife is not so much a sequel as it is a greedy parasite that makes a decorative husk of the original film. Where the original film soared because of the incredible chemistry between a batch of boldly realized characters in conflict, these descendants are poor substitutes that feel more like plot points than people. There’s no crew of characters that you’d die to hang out with. There’s too little zany blending of horror and comedy, and what is offered feels like a rehash of the ‘84 gags - down to a Slimer wannabe called "Muncher." (Because he munches things. Then, there’s the wasting of talent in front of the screen and behind.<br><br><br> Then, she and her far less charismatic crew barrel into a finale that is so similar to the original that I was left jaw-dropped in its audacious lack of imagination. Whatever the Reitmans have in mind, what they made is a soulless sequel that snatches elements of the original but excises the magic that made the other films such marvelous fun. In a panel before the film screening, both the Reitmans waxed poetic about how much this father-son project (Ivan produces) means to them as a family. It’s easy to see where the Reitmans may have seen this story as a winsome one of family and legacy. Then on top of all of that, this sloppy sequel commits a cardinal sin of screenwriting, where the WHOLE plotline could have been prevented if ONE person told someone else ONE thing. Take 20 marbles and pick them up one at a time with your toes and drop them into a Dixie cup and then repeat with the opposite foot. Which aside from being cloyingly sentimental also defies the message of the first film, where a quartet of misfits had to build their own tools then fight their way through mass hysteria into the room to save the day.<br><br><br> Phoebe strolls into the room with ease because the Ghostbusters have already made their mark, and their tools are all right there for the taking. Plus, [https://fikicks.com/product-category/bmw/ fikicks.com] it’s cringe-inducing Egon as deadbeat dad plotline essentially kicks not just Ghostbusters (2016) but also Ghostbusters II (1989) out of the canon. But really, it’s just nepotism with a barrage of sci-fi and horror flare. " Of course, they did, it’s Comic Con! Early reactions out of a surprise screening at New York Comic Con cheered the movie’s many "Easter Eggs." But that term suggests these references to the '84 Ghostbusters are hidden. There is attempted comic relief in a kid called Podcast. Especially with the recent rise of mud-themed off road races (think cross country on steroids), there is nothing stopping you from experiencing the simultaneous joy and pain that is cross country! But that’s not to say that nothing new has emerged - the Redmi 4X, Redmi Note 4X, and Mi 5C had a relatively quiet launch event in India, and that’s pretty much it. Besides the paper-thin protagonists, beyond the gratuitous snatching from the original film, Reitman also chooses a tone that’s less Ghostbusters and more Amblin.<br><br><br> She does well with them, but it’s implied that’s because being a Ghostbuster is in her blood. I hate to say it since it’s the new speed, but the Rebel v2 (just go half a size up). But it’s hard to imagine anyone getting excited enough by this squad to want to see more. Step 2: Give each player enough room to bathe that animal. They taper in the same way the MX624 does but the engineered mesh uppers will give a bit more than the leather of the MX624. Cool girl Lucky (Celeste O'Connor) exists solely to give Trevor a subplot of underbaked teen romance. With so much teen angst and dysfunctional family drama, his slapstick is like a cool glass of water in an endless dry desert. The lead-laden glass is a hazard, and toxic phosphor dust coats the inside of the monitor. To her credit, Grace is engaging as Phoebe, who is given a bit of depth, or at least more screentime. How could he be when he's given lines like, "I call myself Podcast, because of my podcast." Reitman should have begged Academy Award-winning Juno screenwriter Diablo Cody to do a dialogue pass, at least on the kid lingo.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-
+<br> While most shoes designed for flat feet offer significant cushioning and arch support, some don't always provide the level of tread necessary for running on unpredictable terrain. Despite the new characters and a setting far from the Ghostbusters’ signature terrain of New York City, Ghostbusters: Afterlife is not so much a sequel as it is a greedy parasite that makes a decorative husk of the original film. Where the original film soared because of the incredible chemistry between a batch of boldly realized characters in conflict, these descendants are poor substitutes that feel more like plot points than people. There’s no crew of characters that you’d die to hang out with. There’s too little zany blending of horror and comedy, and what is offered feels like a rehash of the ‘84 gags - down to a Slimer wannabe called "Muncher." (Because he munches things. Then, there’s the wasting of talent in front of the screen and behind.<br><br><br> Then, she and her far less charismatic crew barrel into a finale that is so similar to the original that I was left jaw-dropped in its audacious lack of imagination. Whatever the Reitmans have in mind, what they made is a soulless sequel that snatches elements of the original but excises the magic that made the other films such marvelous fun. In a panel before the film screening, both the Reitmans waxed poetic about how much this father-son project (Ivan produces) means to them as a family. It’s easy to see where the Reitmans may have seen this story as a winsome one of family and legacy. Then on top of all of that, this sloppy sequel commits a cardinal sin of screenwriting, where the WHOLE plotline could have been prevented if ONE person told someone else ONE thing. Take 20 marbles and pick them up one at a time with your toes and drop them into a Dixie cup and then repeat with the opposite foot. Which aside from being cloyingly sentimental also defies the message of the first film, where a quartet of misfits had to build their own tools then fight their way through mass hysteria into the room to save the day.<br><br><br> Phoebe strolls into the room with ease because the Ghostbusters have already made their mark, and their tools are all right there for the taking. Plus, [https://fikicks.com/product-category/bmw/ fikicks.com] it’s cringe-inducing Egon as deadbeat dad plotline essentially kicks not just Ghostbusters (2016) but also Ghostbusters II (1989) out of the canon. But really, it’s just nepotism with a barrage of sci-fi and horror flare. " Of course, they did, it’s Comic Con! Early reactions out of a surprise screening at New York Comic Con cheered the movie’s many "Easter Eggs." But that term suggests these references to the '84 Ghostbusters are hidden. There is attempted comic relief in a kid called Podcast. Especially with the recent rise of mud-themed off road races (think cross country on steroids), there is nothing stopping you from experiencing the simultaneous joy and pain that is cross country! But that’s not to say that nothing new has emerged - the Redmi 4X, Redmi Note 4X, and Mi 5C had a relatively quiet launch event in India, and that’s pretty much it. Besides the paper-thin protagonists, beyond the gratuitous snatching from the original film, Reitman also chooses a tone that’s less Ghostbusters and more Amblin.<br><br><br> She does well with them, but it’s implied that’s because being a Ghostbuster is in her blood. I hate to say it since it’s the new speed, but the Rebel v2 (just go half a size up). But it’s hard to imagine anyone getting excited enough by this squad to want to see more. Step 2: Give each player enough room to bathe that animal. They taper in the same way the MX624 does but the engineered mesh uppers will give a bit more than the leather of the MX624. Cool girl Lucky (Celeste O'Connor) exists solely to give Trevor a subplot of underbaked teen romance. With so much teen angst and dysfunctional family drama, his slapstick is like a cool glass of water in an endless dry desert. The lead-laden glass is a hazard, and toxic phosphor dust coats the inside of the monitor. To her credit, Grace is engaging as Phoebe, who is given a bit of depth, or at least more screentime. How could he be when he's given lines like, "I call myself Podcast, because of my podcast." Reitman should have begged Academy Award-winning Juno screenwriter Diablo Cody to do a dialogue pass, at least on the kid lingo.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br> While most shoes designed for flat feet offer significant cushioning and arch support, some don't always provide the level of tread necessary for running on unpredictable terrain. Despite the new characters and a setting far from the Ghostbusters’ signature terrain of New York City, Ghostbusters: Afterlife is not so much a sequel as it is a greedy parasite that makes a decorative husk of the original film. Where the original film soared because of the incredible chemistry between a batch of boldly realized characters in conflict, these descendants are poor substitutes that feel more like plot points than people. There’s no crew of characters that you’d die to hang out with. There’s too little zany blending of horror and comedy, and what is offered feels like a rehash of the ‘84 gags - down to a Slimer wannabe called "Muncher." (Because he munches things. Then, there’s the wasting of talent in front of the screen and behind.<br><br><br> Then, she and her far less charismatic crew barrel into a finale that is so similar to the original that I was left jaw-dropped in its audacious lack of imagination. Whatever the Reitmans have in mind, what they made is a soulless sequel that snatches elements of the original but excises the magic that made the other films such marvelous fun. In a panel before the film screening, both the Reitmans waxed poetic about how much this father-son project (Ivan produces) means to them as a family. It’s easy to see where the Reitmans may have seen this story as a winsome one of family and legacy. Then on top of all of that, this sloppy sequel commits a cardinal sin of screenwriting, where the WHOLE plotline could have been prevented if ONE person told someone else ONE thing. Take 20 marbles and pick them up one at a time with your toes and drop them into a Dixie cup and then repeat with the opposite foot. Which aside from being cloyingly sentimental also defies the message of the first film, where a quartet of misfits had to build their own tools then fight their way through mass hysteria into the room to save the day.<br><br><br> Phoebe strolls into the room with ease because the Ghostbusters have already made their mark, and their tools are all right there for the taking. Plus, [https://fikicks.com/product-category/bmw/ fikicks.com] it’s cringe-inducing Egon as deadbeat dad plotline essentially kicks not just Ghostbusters (2016) but also Ghostbusters II (1989) out of the canon. But really, it’s just nepotism with a barrage of sci-fi and horror flare. " Of course, they did, it’s Comic Con! Early reactions out of a surprise screening at New York Comic Con cheered the movie’s many "Easter Eggs." But that term suggests these references to the '84 Ghostbusters are hidden. There is attempted comic relief in a kid called Podcast. Especially with the recent rise of mud-themed off road races (think cross country on steroids), there is nothing stopping you from experiencing the simultaneous joy and pain that is cross country! But that’s not to say that nothing new has emerged - the Redmi 4X, Redmi Note 4X, and Mi 5C had a relatively quiet launch event in India, and that’s pretty much it. Besides the paper-thin protagonists, beyond the gratuitous snatching from the original film, Reitman also chooses a tone that’s less Ghostbusters and more Amblin.<br><br><br> She does well with them, but it’s implied that’s because being a Ghostbuster is in her blood. I hate to say it since it’s the new speed, but the Rebel v2 (just go half a size up). But it’s hard to imagine anyone getting excited enough by this squad to want to see more. Step 2: Give each player enough room to bathe that animal. They taper in the same way the MX624 does but the engineered mesh uppers will give a bit more than the leather of the MX624. Cool girl Lucky (Celeste O'Connor) exists solely to give Trevor a subplot of underbaked teen romance. With so much teen angst and dysfunctional family drama, his slapstick is like a cool glass of water in an endless dry desert. The lead-laden glass is a hazard, and toxic phosphor dust coats the inside of the monitor. To her credit, Grace is engaging as Phoebe, who is given a bit of depth, or at least more screentime. How could he be when he's given lines like, "I call myself Podcast, because of my podcast." Reitman should have begged Academy Award-winning Juno screenwriter Diablo Cody to do a dialogue pass, at least on the kid lingo.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1656513029 |