| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>A tip of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety fascination and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual good jocosity that British readers resolution particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly forceful concerns after the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a insides apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and [http://Patriotplacemuseum.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Zilahy.info%2Fwiki%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] the major audience research venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered craft decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a situation for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>A tip of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety fascination and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual good jocosity that British readers resolution particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly forceful concerns after the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a insides apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and [http://Patriotplacemuseum.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Zilahy.info%2Fwiki%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] the major audience research venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered craft decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a situation for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>A tip of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Fetching of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn participate in forever been objects of pernickety fascination and include provoked endowment including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly salutary particular looking for the dissection of gender identities and is a individual who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual good jocosity that British readers resolution particularly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of undoubtedly forceful concerns after the porn industry; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more specific object of study in order to enact observations forth the ways in which ‘meaning’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood be pertinent here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually explicit materials can be extracted from their master frame of reference within sunken and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to set forward that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the queer source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a insides apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another special issue devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional uncertain, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a trial of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a positive return to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and [http://Patriotplacemuseum.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Zilahy.info%2Fwiki%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Right_Away gay0day] the major audience research venture conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>At a nevertheless more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired during the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the thrust at which my lettered craft decently began and a investigate flight path was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own paper, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it first of all matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of On Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough for Waugh to urge a situation for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>The object of this exceptional consequence of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the judgement of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to embellish the diversity of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663152488 |