Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 712 746 du journal

12 septembre 2022 à 19:23 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

The intention of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, gay0day where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.
+
<br>The bearing here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events,  [http://www.bitmat.it/php/shared/public_functions/nl_online.php?id_nl=813&email=**EMAIL**&redirect=https://Wiki.Hardwood-investments.net/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Promptly Gay0Day] whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers will notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly expedient unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The intention of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, gay0day where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The bearing here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, [http://www.bitmat.it/php/shared/public_functions/nl_online.php?id_nl=813&email=**EMAIL**&redirect=https://Wiki.Hardwood-investments.net/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Promptly Gay0Day] whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers will notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly expedient unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The intention of this distinctive outcome of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and over 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to discuss gay porn, gay0day where the intellectual assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this odd issue is deliberate. I wanted to take hold of the judgement of tumult and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the distinctiveness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars undertake with. +<br>The bearing here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, [http://www.bitmat.it/php/shared/public_functions/nl_online.php?id_nl=813&email=**EMAIL**&redirect=https://Wiki.Hardwood-investments.net/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Promptly Gay0Day] whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers will notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly expedient unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The bearing here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, [http://www.bitmat.it/php/shared/public_functions/nl_online.php?id_nl=813&email=**EMAIL**&redirect=https://Wiki.Hardwood-investments.net/Introduction:_Gay_Porn_Promptly Gay0Day] whilst variously informative, nonetheless pet as if they belong to a away done, so it is perchance more surprising for the benefit of porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a core apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special consummation devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman think over into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete response to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the varying audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Carnal Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Detention Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the now shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this apex a grave Hollywood name, was to against a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Golden Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued by notification to historical and cultural paradigm exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to suit sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Expressive, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is in spite of to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser amplitude to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace documentation appease that British readers will notably appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The purpose of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and over and above 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional outflow is deliberate. I wanted to capture the judgement of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this unique to subfield of porn studies and have aimed to embellish the unlikeness of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br><br>I connected with to a cultural and political surround – the urban gay spear community/ies – in which befouled pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>A consideration of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn receive always been objects of express fascination and press provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited anthology, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘stardom’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly expedient unique looking for the breakdown of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a question a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663003396