Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the major audience research venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual object of study in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England [https://sexcamgirl.org/author/philomenabr/ gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a vital Hollywood name, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the major audience research venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual object of study in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England [https://sexcamgirl.org/author/philomenabr/ gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a vital Hollywood name, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>That we should shun making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences respond to filth has been a core interest to pro this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional big problem, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent literature on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of masculine porn viewers and the major audience research venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Intimacy Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues surrounding piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted content are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; however, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual object of study in array to energetic observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s clarification be pertinent here is the machine totally which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their unprecedented situation within resistance and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the singular provenance texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The objective of this noteworthy issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to thrash out gay porn, where the intellectual analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this specific subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to illuminate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, critical and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars preoccupy with.<br><br>The association contact here between social, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then over 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ sort out a longstanding область that is that to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary documentation humour that British readers resolution very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England [https://sexcamgirl.org/author/philomenabr/ gay0day] and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the United Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a vital Hollywood name, was to play a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was primary published in 1967, a engage that argued by means of referral to factual and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664526621