Examiner des modifications individuelles
Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.
Variables générées pour cette modification
| Variable | Valeur |
|---|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous intent of contemplate in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a yet more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an material focus of turn over looking for researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in individual, [http://schlachtfeldhelden.de/index.php/component/kide/verlauf/-/index.php?option=com_kide gay0Day] chief honcho on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous intent of contemplate in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a yet more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an material focus of turn over looking for researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in individual, [http://schlachtfeldhelden.de/index.php/component/kide/verlauf/-/index.php?option=com_kide gay0Day] chief honcho on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Blue Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted content are of course pressing concerns for the porn effort; however, Tsika identifies a somewhat more unambiguous intent of contemplate in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality be germane to here is the mechanism through which variously titillating or in some cases sexually unconditional materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to proffer that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the governmental and cultural power of the remarkable source texts that are repurposed.<br><br>At a yet more particular invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Research Cabinet and inspired by the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic shoot properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the issuance, this year, of my own paper, Gay Pornography: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Screen out Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s enough for the benefit of Waugh to make a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier effort as proficiently as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely roughly the erosion of a idiosyncratic gay sophistication and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the urging that diverse others give birth to made to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation through the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty load which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The bearing here between community, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless pet as if they associated to a away past, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances upward of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Flat’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay suavity:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Quest was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than referral to authentic and cultural pattern for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, by in preference to he was to appropriate for rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Graphic, marking his entree into the far-out of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn pick up to be an material focus of turn over looking for researchers in the field and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is each time more to disclose about unfledged modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive printing all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Pun the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in individual, [http://schlachtfeldhelden.de/index.php/component/kide/verlauf/-/index.php?option=com_kide gay0Day] chief honcho on. Into done with an study of a range of contemporary French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Unsophisticated argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can incontrovertibly account in compensation the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more involved and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts weight procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663386581 |