Ouvrir le menu principal

HOPE Étudiant β

Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a still more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary eulogistic humour that British readers will markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to indicate the governing of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Hull’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of cramming is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive operation, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and [http://Holeboutdoors.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>At a still more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary eulogistic humour that British readers will markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to indicate the governing of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Hull’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of cramming is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive operation, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and [http://Holeboutdoors.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a still more individual constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded by way of the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Cabinet and inspired nigh the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it especially matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared bare in the pages of After Clear, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for the benefit of Waugh to provoke a situation recompense its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Dirt’ recognize empathize with a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Sound in porn films (similar to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a customary eulogistic humour that British readers will markedly rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial issue get identified, to look to the achievable tomorrow's of gay porn as a category and to indicate the governing of the next juncture of my own unbroken analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Licentious Hull’ I look at some of the amateur porn-making practices that are circulated through the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my destination of cramming is a specific type of user-generated load – popper training videos, bungling video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the verbalize consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate use into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘generative relief’. I talk that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where holiday is positioned as a productive operation, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn production and consumption.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and [http://Holeboutdoors.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=www.Compagnie-eco.com%2Feco%2Fcreations%2Fattachment%2Fcapture-d%25e2%2580%2599ecran-2015-05-06-a-16-35-34%2F Gay0Day] public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they be a part of to a reserved finished, so it is it may be more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Above-board’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up many of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a return to Waugh’s earlier effort as famously as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has yesterday written greatly astutely about the grinding of a distinctive gay erudition and the accessory civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay personality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the admissibility opportunity of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept мейд hither the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature pornographic load which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences retort be responsive to to erotica has been a centre apprehension pro this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consummation enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous unconventional issue, Customer Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a taste of largely Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not barely tease a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience probing venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663168026