| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a primary Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than notification to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular egress entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of found sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding activity, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a centre apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous special uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a supportive return to gay porn and [http://Www.Budapest-Geo.hu/click.php?url=https://Www.Tifointer.org/forum/profile/vjklatosha44166/ http://www.budapest-geo.hu/click.php?url=https://www.tifointer.org/forum/Profile/vjklatosha44166/] the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a primary Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than notification to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular egress entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of found sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding activity, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a centre apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous special uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a supportive return to gay porn and [http://Www.Budapest-Geo.hu/click.php?url=https://Www.Tifointer.org/forum/profile/vjklatosha44166/ http://www.budapest-geo.hu/click.php?url=https://www.tifointer.org/forum/Profile/vjklatosha44166/] the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is naturally a revisiting of the past, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is admirable (his feather of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me laugh every schedule I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Unqualified: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his effort was on no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the introduce of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In particular this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematized rubric repayment for division and the uniquely apposite (and in uncountable regards fatidic) word that gay porn does not along in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>The joint here between community, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant gone, so it is perhaps more surprising in the interest porn scholars to note that it is now during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational essay ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Level’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal appropriate for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to development in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this point a primary Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a book that argued sooner than notification to factual and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Inexorably, my own article is an attempt to protract together some of the themes that the contributors to this singular egress entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a category and to call the supervision of the next present of my own unbroken examination in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Smutty Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated help of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In marked, my destination of cramming is a specific envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, amateur video that repurposes a index of found sources with the express good of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate use into an vocation that puissance be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance indicate, in these neoliberal times where ease is positioned as a rewarding activity, a fresh if unexpected directorate quest of porn canada display and consumption.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to erotica has been a centre apprehension for this newsletter and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another extraordinary consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the propinquitous special uncertain, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not barely have a supportive return to gay porn and [http://Www.Budapest-Geo.hu/click.php?url=https://Www.Tifointer.org/forum/profile/vjklatosha44166/ http://www.budapest-geo.hu/click.php?url=https://www.tifointer.org/forum/Profile/vjklatosha44166/] the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the prime audience research venture conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1665183557 |
