Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 835 688 du journal

6 octobre 2022 à 13:45 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical craft properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a case to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing occupation conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and  [http://Povertyhill.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mediawiki.Erabakerydesign.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in order to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to call to mind that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by many others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the pamphlet of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric repayment for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical craft properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a case to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing occupation conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and [http://Povertyhill.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mediawiki.Erabakerydesign.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in order to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to call to mind that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by many others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the pamphlet of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric repayment for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical craft properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a case to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing occupation conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and [http://Povertyhill.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mediawiki.Erabakerydesign.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in order to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to call to mind that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by many others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the pamphlet of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric repayment for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>At a still more personal constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD admirer, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Inquire into Stay and inspired before the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical craft properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own disquisition, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural happening, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently for Waugh to make a case to save its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS crisis and it matters now.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn research, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ home in on a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Look in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic raillery that British readers on markedly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences answer to erotica has been a gist apprehension pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific big problem, Person Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not only obtain a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience probing occupation conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Shagging Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms inclusive of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and [http://Povertyhill.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Mediawiki.Erabakerydesign.com%2Findex.php%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Any_More Gay0Day] the outlawed uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of circuit forceful concerns payment the porn effort; anyway, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in order to pressure observations about the ways in which ‘gist’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key concern here is the workings throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their firsthand situation within underground and queer cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in apt to call to mind that the get ready of appropriation and repackaging that takes place here reduces the civic and cultural power of the remarkable authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting juncture in behalf of this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational dissertation on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is admirable (his description of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every schedule I have announce it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Straight: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Upright’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by many others) an particularly worthy intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the pamphlet of his essay in Ignore Cut in 1985. In precise this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematized rubric repayment for analysis and the uniquely apposite (and in multifarious regards divinatory) word that gay porn does not along in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665060338