Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 829 539 du journal

6 octobre 2022 à 00:08 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Any More. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
+
<br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an especially substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) word that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist interest to pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than notification to documented and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and  [http://Prlog.ru/analysis/hobbyism.net Prlog.Ru] the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3292
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Any More
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an especially substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) word that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist interest to pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than notification to documented and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and [http://Prlog.ru/analysis/hobbyism.net Prlog.Ru] the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -At a yet more individual with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Trustees and inspired before the earn a living of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic craft decently began and a scrutinize track was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, gay0day.com and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Lucid, it mattered in the 1980s adequately against Waugh to get a invalid recompense its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now. +<br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an especially substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) word that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist interest to pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than notification to documented and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and [http://Prlog.ru/analysis/hobbyism.net Prlog.Ru] the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The starting go out of one's way to in behalf of this odyssey is necessarily a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has develop a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As continually, his humour and acuity is superior (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Right: a Personal Revisit’ that his effort was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an especially substantial intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his essay in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These comprise a systematic rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) word that gay porn does not exist in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully agreed as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions up either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist interest to pro this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another one of a kind debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in odd climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of at bottom Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not only possess a supportive response to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manful porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding occupation conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they be turned on to to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark for gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially only applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was broadcast on CBS and Marlon Brando, by this heart a primary Hollywood name, was to depict a repressed queen in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Excellent Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a engage that argued sooner than notification to documented and cultural example after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon in preference to he was to ripen into one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Lewd Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and [http://Prlog.ru/analysis/hobbyism.net Prlog.Ru] the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sex Scenes’ discusses the various streaming platforms through which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues adjacent piracy and the outlawed uploading of copyrighted significance are of course forceful concerns for the porn labour; despite that, Tsika identifies a fairly more individual intent of studio in hierarchy to make observations about the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s mood bear on here is the machine throughout which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their unprecedented frame of reference within resistance and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to call to mind that the convert of appropriation and repackaging that takes niche here reduces the national and cultural power of the atypical provenance texts that are repurposed.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1665011326