Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 818 538 du journal

4 octobre 2022 à 21:33 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material focus of turn over after researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an study of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested via the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present special climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and  [http://Www.Burn3.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D850558 Gay0day] acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for division and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material focus of turn over after researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an study of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested via the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present special climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and [http://Www.Burn3.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D850558 Gay0day] acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for division and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material focus of turn over after researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an study of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested via the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present special climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and [http://Www.Burn3.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D850558 Gay0day] acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for division and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an material focus of turn over after researchers in the cope with and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is always more to noise abroad surrounding new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and digressive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive issue all focus on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Immature tackles the textuality of porn, and contemporary gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an study of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Immature notes in his article that the semblance of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more intricate and a good less binaristic than one-time accounts dominion take suggested via the propinquity of the machine of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to smut has been a centre apprehension exchange for this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Exactly, another special issue doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the present special climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected representation of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not exclusively obtain a positive response to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of masculine porn viewers and the crucial audience check out project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this journey is necessarily a revisiting of the biography, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to specify his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational dissertation for scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the conditions of the field. As many times, his cleverness and [http://Www.Burn3.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Isisinvokes.com%2Fsmf2018%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D850558 Gay0day] acuity is splendid (his representation of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every experience I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his bash at was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my inspection (and this is a picture shared by sundry others) an primarily mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the set of group and cultural circumstances that lead to the pamphlet of his tract in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematic rubric for division and the uncommonly apposite (and in multifarious regards vatic) observation that gay porn does not be present in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the essence of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lead’. The stars of gay porn participate in every time been objects of particular charm and include provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Darling and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited gleaning, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a run the gamut of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable particular for the dissection of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664915616