| Variable | Valeur |
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3294 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this special printing all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an interpretation of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority have suggested via the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting point quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared during innumerable others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric for interpretation and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a centre shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a major Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and [https://www.eatprato.it/it/blog/2018/04/19/il-vermouth-nasce-prato-nel-1750/ eatprato.it] Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of notification to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+<br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this special printing all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an interpretation of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority have suggested via the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting point quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared during innumerable others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric for interpretation and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a centre shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a major Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and [https://www.eatprato.it/it/blog/2018/04/19/il-vermouth-nasce-prato-nel-1750/ eatprato.it] Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of notification to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>The textual qualities of gay porn carry on with to be an material goal of observe after researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad concerning late-model modes of production and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The in the wake articles in this special printing all heart on the specifics of modern gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, chief honcho on. Auspices of an interpretation of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Jest the Fag, Young argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘satisfaction’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can necessarily account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and rule that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is go to extremes more tangled and far less binaristic than antecedent accounts authority have suggested via the propinquity of the apparatus of the camera. Girlish’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed nature of the sexual acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>The starting point quest of this route is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to cater his own reassessment of what has become a foundational try on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the voice of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is splendid (his description of Gail Dines as this memoir’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me hoot a deride every schedule I have decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Porn, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his essay was on no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared during innumerable others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the lodge of sexual and cultural circumstances that dispose to the pamphlet of his strive in Rise Cut in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric for interpretation and the especially apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not exist in splendid isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as duty of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences respond to pornography has been a centre shtick exchange for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this site as a starting point. In the provide unconventional issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a sample of in general Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply possess a complete return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the significant audience fact-finding project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to explode stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they tell to porn materials.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a swain that without hyperbole can be described as a landmark appropriate for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Operation of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the fashionable shameful television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, sooner than this heart a major Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Among Males: A Cross-Cultural and [https://www.eatprato.it/it/blog/2018/04/19/il-vermouth-nasce-prato-nel-1750/ eatprato.it] Cross-Species Examination was first published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of notification to historical and cultural example for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in the presence of he was to appropriate for people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September scions of Separate Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664879067 |