| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution particularly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved finished, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre concern representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience check out occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and [https://rapid-Sells.com/user/profile/600215 Gay0Day] generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution particularly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved finished, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre concern representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience check out occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and [https://rapid-Sells.com/user/profile/600215 Gay0Day] generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | A tip of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Attractive of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn have forever been objects of pernickety charm and possess provoked scholarship including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Prestige (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose unanimity has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an singularly useful discrete for the examination of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a without question a void of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>There are pacific lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ sort out a longstanding area that is moreover to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (similar to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst furnish some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular wholesome jocosity that British readers resolution particularly understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we imagine’.<br><br>I have a proper place in to a cultural and federal surround – the urban gay virile community/ies – in which salacious pictures own a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal concerning gay men in the United Kingdom. It is just now 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for the sake gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the age shaming telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood name, was to play a repressed homosexual in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Middle Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Investigation was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to historical and cultural precedent after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become rhyme of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Bod Graphic, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the chronicle themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own sensible appraisal of 30 years of probing into gay porn. Maddison has previously written greatly astutely roughly the corroding of a distinctive gay culture and the cohort civic implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others have made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this assertion into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a reserved finished, so it is it is possible that more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Pornography: Gay vs Straight’, in which he distinguished the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a centre concern representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another one of a kind debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited past Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous special issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier memorize into the responses of a representational of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively possess a upbeat answer to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent leaflets on the diversified audiences someone is concerned gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience check out occupation conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and [https://rapid-Sells.com/user/profile/600215 Gay0Day] generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1664802006 |
