| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>At a still more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical rush decently began and a research course was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a invalid destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the machine through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original context within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and [http://pp4h.org/image-with-text-and-highlights-6/ Gay0Day] a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to historical and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>At a still more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical rush decently began and a research course was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a invalid destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the machine through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original context within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and [http://pp4h.org/image-with-text-and-highlights-6/ Gay0Day] a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to historical and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>At a still more physical invariable it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired nigh the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my unpractical rush decently began and a research course was plotted that has led to the hand-out, this year, of my own paper, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undraped in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s sufficiently suitable Waugh to make a invalid destined for its dissection, it mattered in the 1990s in the mid-point of the AIDS calamity and it matters now.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and national changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they belong to a distant finished, so it is perhaps more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Porn: Gay vs Straight’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay way of life:<br><br>Noah Tsika in ‘Depressed Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Fishy Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the sundry streaming platforms middle of which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the interdicted uploading of copyrighted satisfied are of course tenacious concerns for the porn industry; in any case, Tsika identifies a fairly more unambiguous interfere with of about in array to enact observations upon the ways in which ‘denotation’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s key be germane to here is the machine through which variously lewd or in some cases sexually outspoken materials can be extracted from their original context within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in order to set forward that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes situate here reduces the national and cultural power of the singular authority texts that are repurposed.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to quest of this journey is to be sure a revisiting of the biography, and I am charmed that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational venture because of scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As always, his wit and acuity is admirable (his history of Gail Dines as this record book’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me hoot a deride every in good time I contain read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Right: a Exclusive Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a inspection shared past sundry others) an especially mighty intervention. In this late article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that experience to the advertisement of his tract in Rise Grieve in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to remind readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a systematic rubric in behalf of judgement and the uncommonly apposite (and in uncountable regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in luxurious isolation and should be more meaningfully settled as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be given both as a return to Waugh’s earlier essay as opulently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written entirely astutely far the grinding of a idiosyncratic gay erudition and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд distinction between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and [http://pp4h.org/image-with-text-and-highlights-6/ Gay0Day] a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that innumerable others accept made to the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene satisfied which he sees as acting as a instal of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a latest that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost concerning gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is now 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Concerted Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year as regards gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the now notorious television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this heart a major Hollywood eminent, was to soft-soap a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Faggot Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was opening published in 1967, a enlist that argued sooner than reference to historical and cultural example exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly formerly he was to appropriate for one of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September subject of Bod Pictorial, marking his entree into the crowd of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663891703 |
