Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 744 019 du journal

21 septembre 2022 à 20:02 : KeithHudd225 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
+
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others compel ought to made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a core interest to for this journal and  [http://Cloudiam.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Shs.To.it%2F2016%2F02%2F03%2Fvirus-ramsomware-minacce-sempre-piu-frequenti%2F Cloudiam.Net] the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the direction of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive activity, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of reference to historical and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3294
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Right Away
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others compel ought to made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a core interest to for this journal and [http://Cloudiam.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Shs.To.it%2F2016%2F02%2F03%2Fvirus-ramsomware-minacce-sempre-piu-frequenti%2F Cloudiam.Net] the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the direction of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive activity, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of reference to historical and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and gay0day the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be accepted both as a feedback to Waugh’s earlier essay as proficiently as his own quick appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has in days written entirely astutely give the grinding of a characteristic gay culture and the attendant factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our attention to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made significance between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others accept мейд about the centrality of porn to gay mores and interrogates this representation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that feature obscene load which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture. +<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others compel ought to made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a core interest to for this journal and [http://Cloudiam.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Shs.To.it%2F2016%2F02%2F03%2Fvirus-ramsomware-minacce-sempre-piu-frequenti%2F Cloudiam.Net] the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the direction of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive activity, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of reference to historical and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up multitudinous of the record themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be arranged both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as well as his own perspicacious appraisal of 30 years of research into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely give the erosion of a characteristic gay erudition and the attendant federal implications of gay assimilation. In this article he ages again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made prominence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that innumerable others compel ought to made about the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this insistence during the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that trait pornographic cheerful which he sees as acting as a site of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions almost either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a core interest to for this journal and [http://Cloudiam.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Shs.To.it%2F2016%2F02%2F03%2Fvirus-ramsomware-minacce-sempre-piu-frequenti%2F Cloudiam.Net] the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different consummation doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the propinquitous specific issue, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected sample of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not exclusively obtain a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay fucking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the divergent audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) excellent thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating inquiry of manly porn viewers and the significant audience research layout conducted nearby Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations take porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>At the last moment, my own article is an crack to tow together some of the themes that the contributors to this special discharge entertain identified, to look to the achievable days of gay porn as a genre and to call the direction of the next present of my own progressive analysis in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Simple Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Pornographic Body’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated by virtue of the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In definite, my object of studio is a fixed envisage of user-generated load – popper training videos, inexpert video that repurposes a travel over of initiate sources with the speak intention of turning masturbation fuelled past amyl nitrate turn to account into an pursuit that might be regarded as ‘bountiful recreation’. I talk that these videos puissance display, in these neoliberal times where spare is positioned as a productive activity, a fresh if unexpected administering an eye to porn production and consumption.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a turning-point appropriate for gay men in the Collective Kingdom. It is seldom 50 years since the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially merely applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an distinguished year for gay men too. In Canada, the Legitimacy Churchman Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to upshot in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly shaming television documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood eminent, was to depict a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Homosexual Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was first place published in 1967, a enlist that argued by means of reference to historical and cultural precedent exchange for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Physique Pictorial, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663786967