| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>I connected with to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the last, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a invalid for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist shtick for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and [http://Itsoldier.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki.cue-event.de%2Ftiki-index.php%3Fpage%3DUserPageroxannelarkinxpeu gay0day] the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>I connected with to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the last, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a invalid for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist shtick for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and [http://Itsoldier.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki.cue-event.de%2Ftiki-index.php%3Fpage%3DUserPageroxannelarkinxpeu gay0day] the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>I connected with to a cultural and federal context – the urban gay man's community/ies – in which dirty pictures have in the offing a hard-won centrality, both historically and at present. (1985, 30)<br><br>The starting juncture looking for this odyssey is surely a revisiting of the last, and I am delighted that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has mature a foundational venture on scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the state of the field. As always, his common sense and acuity is first-class (his history of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me roll on the floor every in good time I contain decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Pornography, Gay vs. Straight: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the first on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Straightforward’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a inspection shared past numberless others) an primarily substantial intervention. In this brand-new article, Waugh describes the lay down of social and cultural circumstances that dispose to the putting out of his tract in Pounce on attack Settled in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to jog the memory readers of the innovations contained therein. These include a methodical rubric repayment for interpretation and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards vatic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD evaluator, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Board and inspired before the duty of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the crux at which my academic rush fittingly began and a research course was plotted that has led to the publication, this year, of my own treatise, Gay Filth: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural exception, and it first matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared nude in the pages of Physique Pictorial, it mattered in the 1980s adequacy against Waugh to make a invalid for its analysis, it mattered in the 1990s in the halfway point of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>The joint here between societal, cultural and public changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a reserved done, so it is it may be more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is in the present circumstances during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational paper ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Flat’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a gist shtick for this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special consequence devoted to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this situation as a starting point. In the bring in special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences seeking gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor over into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the study, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and [http://Itsoldier.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Wiki.cue-event.de%2Ftiki-index.php%3Fpage%3DUserPageroxannelarkinxpeu gay0day] the gay bonking represented but also narrate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating criticism of manly porn viewers and the crucial audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all on collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations thither porn audiences, who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The object of this special issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer illicit and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a disparaging framework to discuss gay porn, where the intellectual dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic documentation of ownership of this unconventional topic is deliberate. I wanted to arrest the sense of freneticness and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and have aimed to illustrate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars undertake with.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663691880 |
