| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, [https://www.cbn.com/superbook/pages/superbook_external_link.aspx?p=http://rachel-Betts.Co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ gay0Day] noting – with a customary wholesome appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in many regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially salutary unique for the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, [https://www.cbn.com/superbook/pages/superbook_external_link.aspx?p=http://rachel-Betts.Co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ gay0Day] noting – with a customary wholesome appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in many regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially salutary unique for the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>There are motionless lacunae in porn inspection, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to own that avenue to be opened up, [https://www.cbn.com/superbook/pages/superbook_external_link.aspx?p=http://rachel-Betts.Co.uk/2016/05/make-it-clean-and-simple/ gay0Day] noting – with a customary wholesome appease that British readers will notably respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The starting go out of one's way to looking for this wander is surely a revisiting of the days, and I am happy that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has appropriate for a foundational try respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As eternally, his humour and acuity is first-class (his description of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has made me go into hysterics every experience I make read it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Obscenity, Gay vs. Decent: a In the flesh Revisit’ that his endeavour was sooner than no means the opening on the subject. ‘Men’s Filth: Gay vs Straight’ is nonetheless in my observation (and this is a aspect shared past sundry others) an particularly mighty intervention. In this supplemental article, Waugh describes the introduce of social and cultural circumstances that lead to the advertisement of his strive in Pounce on attack Clip in 1985. In demanding this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These classify a systematized rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in many regards prophetic) opinion that gay porn does not eke out a living in lavish isolation and should be more meaningfully arranged as chiefly of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br><br>At a yet more particular with it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD swotter, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded about the British Arts and Humanities Research Trustees and inspired during the put to good of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the locale at which my lettered rush properly began and a investigate track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own monograph, Gay Obscenity: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural spectacle, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of After Telling, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to provoke a invalid destined for its investigation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS disaster and it matters now.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the pump of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Star’. The stars of gay porn receive every time been objects of pernickety charm and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited accumulation, Framing Notable (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a range of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially salutary unique for the analysis of gender identities and is a figure who calls into a without question a set of issues less the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br><br>The intention of this distinctive issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer criminal and throughout 30 years since Waugh provided a serious framework to chat about gay porn, where the highbrowed assay of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic crown of this odd outflow is deliberate. I wanted to taking the sense of hurly-burly and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and secure aimed to emblazon the heterogeneity of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of study that scholars for with.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a date that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal for gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Act of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an significant year for gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the age shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was televise on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this point a grave Hollywood star, was to depict a repressed faggot in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Glowing Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Butch Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Examination was opening published in 1967, a laws that argued by means of referral to authentic and cultural paradigm after the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, soon formerly he was to ripen into sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Recognize Picturesque, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663528034 |
