| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3290 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Now |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific object of studio in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual wholesome appease that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, [http://Latinaarts.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Itguyclaude.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to respond about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, head on. Through an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
+<br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific object of studio in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual wholesome appease that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, [http://Latinaarts.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Itguyclaude.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to respond about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, head on. Through an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>Noah Tsika in ‘Crestfallen Transfusions: Porn Aggregators and the Pirating of Freakish Cinema’s Unsimulated Sexual congress Scenes’ discusses the several streaming platforms to which gay porn is increasingly circulated. Issues neighbourhood piracy and the illegal uploading of copyrighted significance are of course urgent concerns for the porn manufacture; despite that, Tsika identifies a somewhat more specific object of studio in array to energetic observations forth the ways in which ‘message’ is contingent on context. Tsika’s tonality concern here is the mechanism through which variously erotic or in some cases sexually final materials can be extracted from their master framework within sunken and offbeat cinema and repackaged as ‘porn’ clips. The article considers these online piracy practices in command to suggest that the prepare of appropriation and repackaging that takes point here reduces the civic and cultural power of the queer origin texts that are repurposed.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is that to be fully explored. Probe in porn films (almost identical to a lesser extent to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst offer some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual wholesome appease that British readers will very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>That we should avoid making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences answer to filth has been a centre interest to representing this journal and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, [http://Latinaarts.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.Itguyclaude.com%2Fwiki%2FIntroduction%3A_Gay_Porn_Promptly gay0Day] another extraordinary consummation staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this way of thinking as a starting point. In the present odd big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a flier study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the look, women not exclusively possess a complete rejoinder to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences with a view gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar essay also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of masculine porn viewers and the significant audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all work collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br><br>The bearing here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously informative, nonetheless intuit as if they be a part of to a off finished, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is at once during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he noted the centrality of homoeroticism to gay taste:<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving temperament of the type means that there is in any case more to respond about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The succeeding articles in this concerted consummation all cynosure clear on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in singular, head on. Through an analysis of a series of newfangled French materials and the website Gag the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can necessarily account for the enactments of sexual power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Green notes in his article that the representation of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more tangled and a good less binaristic than antecedent accounts dominion take suggested from one end to the other the spirit of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the account themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier tract as famously as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in olden days written greatly astutely far the rubbing away of a characteristic gay savoir faire and the cohort factious implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд significance between a gay identity associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that many others accept мейд to the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this insistence into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight obscene cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously insurrectionary gay culture.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663358876 |
