Journal des déclenchements du filtre antiabus

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Ce journal affiche une liste des actions détectées par les filtres.

Détails pour l'entrée 729 281 du journal

16 septembre 2022 à 14:15 : EstebanPearse2 (discussion | contributions) a déclenché le filtre antiabus 4, en effectuant l’action « edit » sur How Important Is Fucking In A Relationship. Actions entreprises : Interdire la modification ; Description du filtre : Empêcher la création de pages de pub utilisateur (examiner)

Changements faits lors de la modification

When considering how day in and day out a join should have sex, a 2015 mug up organize that extensive well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, thetranny but only to an extent.13 Relationship joy improved progressively from having no going to bed up to having going to bed years a week but did not benefit accessory (and absolutely decreased to some) beyond this point.
+
<br>One propagative encounter per week is virtually steadfast with the informed average. However, our increasingly diligent lives may be getting in the means of having more sex. Compared to the frequency of relations in the 1990s, adults in 2010 were having sex nine fewer times per year.14<br>Ordinary Sensuous Frequency<br><br>When considering how often a couple should maintain mating, a 2015 study set that prevalent well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, but no greater than to an extent.13 Relationship redress improved progressively from having no coupling up to having intimacy on one occasion a week but did not upgrade accessory (and in reality decreased moderately) beyond this point.<br><br>How important union is can vary from one specific to the next. Some people may feel that being a sexual couple is positively vital. Others may fondle that other types of intimacy and union are more important.<br><br>Relations in a monogamous relationship increases your even of commitment and emotional connection with the other person. Expressing leaning auspices of sexual congress increases the good chance of couples staying together. As a upshot, sex is certainly associated with a turn down disunion rate.<br><br>Sex can bring into the world a mix of benefits. It can stop succour sturdy relationships and  [http://escorthatti.org/author/npnadrianna/ escorthatti.Org] may better overall well-being. It is also linked to individual benefits including accent ease, improved log a few zees z's, increased freedom, and healthier cardiac health.<br><br>Although frequency often decreases with seniority, propagative pursuit in older adults remains important. In general, older married couples demonstrate a tendency to acquire sexual congress more usually than unmarried peers within the unchanging seniority group.1<br>

Paramètres de l'action

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
EstebanPearse2
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3413
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
How Important Is Fucking In A Relationship
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
How Important Is Fucking In A Relationship
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
When considering how day in and day out a join should have sex, a 2015 mug up organize that extensive well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, thetranny but only to an extent.13 Relationship joy improved progressively from having no going to bed up to having going to bed years a week but did not benefit accessory (and absolutely decreased to some) beyond this point.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>One propagative encounter per week is virtually steadfast with the informed average. However, our increasingly diligent lives may be getting in the means of having more sex. Compared to the frequency of relations in the 1990s, adults in 2010 were having sex nine fewer times per year.14<br>Ordinary Sensuous Frequency<br><br>When considering how often a couple should maintain mating, a 2015 study set that prevalent well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, but no greater than to an extent.13 Relationship redress improved progressively from having no coupling up to having intimacy on one occasion a week but did not upgrade accessory (and in reality decreased moderately) beyond this point.<br><br>How important union is can vary from one specific to the next. Some people may feel that being a sexual couple is positively vital. Others may fondle that other types of intimacy and union are more important.<br><br>Relations in a monogamous relationship increases your even of commitment and emotional connection with the other person. Expressing leaning auspices of sexual congress increases the good chance of couples staying together. As a upshot, sex is certainly associated with a turn down disunion rate.<br><br>Sex can bring into the world a mix of benefits. It can stop succour sturdy relationships and [http://escorthatti.org/author/npnadrianna/ escorthatti.Org] may better overall well-being. It is also linked to individual benefits including accent ease, improved log a few zees z's, increased freedom, and healthier cardiac health.<br><br>Although frequency often decreases with seniority, propagative pursuit in older adults remains important. In general, older married couples demonstrate a tendency to acquire sexual congress more usually than unmarried peers within the unchanging seniority group.1<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -When considering how day in and day out a join should have sex, a 2015 mug up organize that extensive well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, thetranny but only to an extent.13 Relationship joy improved progressively from having no going to bed up to having going to bed years a week but did not benefit accessory (and absolutely decreased to some) beyond this point. +<br>One propagative encounter per week is virtually steadfast with the informed average. However, our increasingly diligent lives may be getting in the means of having more sex. Compared to the frequency of relations in the 1990s, adults in 2010 were having sex nine fewer times per year.14<br>Ordinary Sensuous Frequency<br><br>When considering how often a couple should maintain mating, a 2015 study set that prevalent well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, but no greater than to an extent.13 Relationship redress improved progressively from having no coupling up to having intimacy on one occasion a week but did not upgrade accessory (and in reality decreased moderately) beyond this point.<br><br>How important union is can vary from one specific to the next. Some people may feel that being a sexual couple is positively vital. Others may fondle that other types of intimacy and union are more important.<br><br>Relations in a monogamous relationship increases your even of commitment and emotional connection with the other person. Expressing leaning auspices of sexual congress increases the good chance of couples staying together. As a upshot, sex is certainly associated with a turn down disunion rate.<br><br>Sex can bring into the world a mix of benefits. It can stop succour sturdy relationships and [http://escorthatti.org/author/npnadrianna/ escorthatti.Org] may better overall well-being. It is also linked to individual benefits including accent ease, improved log a few zees z's, increased freedom, and healthier cardiac health.<br><br>Although frequency often decreases with seniority, propagative pursuit in older adults remains important. In general, older married couples demonstrate a tendency to acquire sexual congress more usually than unmarried peers within the unchanging seniority group.1<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>One propagative encounter per week is virtually steadfast with the informed average. However, our increasingly diligent lives may be getting in the means of having more sex. Compared to the frequency of relations in the 1990s, adults in 2010 were having sex nine fewer times per year.14<br>Ordinary Sensuous Frequency<br><br>When considering how often a couple should maintain mating, a 2015 study set that prevalent well-being is associated with libidinous frequency, but no greater than to an extent.13 Relationship redress improved progressively from having no coupling up to having intimacy on one occasion a week but did not upgrade accessory (and in reality decreased moderately) beyond this point.<br><br>How important union is can vary from one specific to the next. Some people may feel that being a sexual couple is positively vital. Others may fondle that other types of intimacy and union are more important.<br><br>Relations in a monogamous relationship increases your even of commitment and emotional connection with the other person. Expressing leaning auspices of sexual congress increases the good chance of couples staying together. As a upshot, sex is certainly associated with a turn down disunion rate.<br><br>Sex can bring into the world a mix of benefits. It can stop succour sturdy relationships and [http://escorthatti.org/author/npnadrianna/ escorthatti.Org] may better overall well-being. It is also linked to individual benefits including accent ease, improved log a few zees z's, increased freedom, and healthier cardiac health.<br><br>Although frequency often decreases with seniority, propagative pursuit in older adults remains important. In general, older married couples demonstrate a tendency to acquire sexual congress more usually than unmarried peers within the unchanging seniority group.1<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663334100