| Variable | Valeur |
|---|
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit) | |
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name) | KeithHudd225 |
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups) | *
user
autoconfirmed
|
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile) | |
Numéro de la page (article_articleid) | 3291 |
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace) | 0 |
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext) | Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly |
Action (action) | edit |
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary) | |
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model) | wikitext |
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model) | wikitext |
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext) | The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. |
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext) | <br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a core apprehension representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in specific climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by innumerable others) an especially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will-power very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and [http://Familyofficeegypt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=s478936579.onlinehome.us%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D71155 Gay0day] his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of express pull and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br> |
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff) | @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
+<br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a core apprehension representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in specific climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by innumerable others) an especially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will-power very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and [http://Familyofficeegypt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=s478936579.onlinehome.us%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D71155 Gay0day] his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of express pull and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines) | <br>That we should shun making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences answer to pornography has been a core apprehension representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Undoubtedly, another special debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited by Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the bring in specific climax, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Fixed: "He’s too Compelling Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences for gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a pilot study into the responses of a trial of in general Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not barely tease a upbeat return to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent belles-lettres on the diverse audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) select thesis also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of manly porn viewers and the major audience check out venture conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to blast stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>The starting unimportant quest of this route is naturally a revisiting of the last, and I am pleased that Thomas Waugh has been persuaded to provender his own reassessment of what has become a foundational essay respecting scholars of gay porn and his own reflections on the status of the field. As many times, his humour and acuity is first-class (his feather of Gail Dines as this review’s ‘demogogue nemesis’ has мейд me go into hysterics every time I make decipher it), as is his modesty, acknowledging, as he does in ‘Men’s Erotica, Gay vs. Unqualified: a Personal Revisit’ that his bash at was by no means the initial on the subject. ‘Men’s Erotica: Gay vs Unambiguous’ is nonetheless in my spectacle (and this is a view shared by innumerable others) an especially mighty intervention. In this new article, Waugh describes the lodge of group and cultural circumstances that dispose to the publication of his strive in Rise Clip in 1985. In exceptional this reappraisal usefully works to prompt readers of the innovations contained therein. These incorporate a planned rubric in behalf of analysis and the uncommonly apposite (and in diverse regards fatidic) observation that gay porn does not along in magnificent isolation and should be more meaningfully understood as say of what Tom describes as a ‘continuum’ here.<br>There are even so lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Pornography’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser limit to performance) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to appropriate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual documentation appease that British readers will-power very understand – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we hear as much as the pants we date’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up diverse of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and [http://Familyofficeegypt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=s478936579.onlinehome.us%2Findex.php%3Faction%3Dprofile%26u%3D71155 Gay0day] his intervention can be understood both as a answer to Waugh’s earlier effort as opulently as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of experiment with into gay porn. Maddison has in days written very much astutely give the erosion of a distinctive gay culture and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he before you can turn around again draws our notoriety to David Halperin’s (2014) recently made excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the odds of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the earthy that diverse others accept made about the centrality of porn to gay good breeding and interrogates this proclamation into done with the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight smutty cheerful which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously revolutionary gay culture.<br><br>A kindliness of the performative is at the heart of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Tasteful of a Transindividual Porn Lady’. The stars of gay porn give birth to forever been objects of express pull and possess provoked education including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Matin‚e idol and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Celebrity (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘toast of the town’ Chris Crocker, whose identity has transitioned at a collection of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an especially expedient particular through despite the analysis of gender identities and is a worthy who calls into a question a set of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>
|
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp) | 1663248108 |
