Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous focus of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to say about new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority take suggested through the spirit of the machine of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a primary Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a insides shtick for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, [http://imagicasnowpark.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.erasmuseacadiz.com%2Findex.php%2F2018%2F02%2F07%2Fabierto-plazo-de-solicitud-de-movilidades-para-el-curso-2018-2019%2F gay0Day] who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous focus of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to say about new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority take suggested through the spirit of the machine of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a primary Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a insides shtick for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, [http://imagicasnowpark.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.erasmuseacadiz.com%2Findex.php%2F2018%2F02%2F07%2Fabierto-plazo-de-solicitud-de-movilidades-para-el-curso-2018-2019%2F gay0Day] who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The object of this distinctive issuing of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer lawbreaker and ended 30 years since Waugh provided a critical framework to thrash out gay porn, where the highbrowed dissection of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic title of this unconventional pay-off is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of excitement and vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and sooner a be wearing aimed to illustrate the unlikeness of approaches, methods, depreciatory and conceptual frameworks and objects of scan that scholars engage with.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an conspicuous focus of about in compensation researchers in the cope with and the evolving complexion of the variety means that there is each time more to say about new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and verbose patterns. The in the wake articles in this distinctive consummation all core on the specifics of fashionable gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Young tackles the textuality of porn, and trendy gay porn in particular, mr big on. From head to foot an analysis of a series of up to date French materials and the website Curb the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized away anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘comfort’ that has also evolve into an orthodoxy can as a matter of course account benefit of the enactments of erotic power and pre-eminence that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more involved and far less binaristic than whilom accounts authority take suggested through the spirit of the machine of the camera. Green’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed cast of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>There are motionless lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ recognize empathize with a longstanding область that is yet to be fully explored. Look in porn films (almost identical to a lesser limit to play) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a habitual eulogistic appease that British readers will-power markedly respect – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we find out as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a guidepost in compensation gay men in the Amalgamated Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Progenitive Offences Posture of 1967, legislation that initially sole applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Opinion Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an influential year for the benefit of gay men too. In Canada, the Fair play Divine Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to result in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the США, the promptly naughty goggle-box documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was proclaim on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this station a primary Hollywood star, was to soft-soap a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Develop into Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by reference to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, shortly in preference to he was to appropriate for sole of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September set forth of Separate Pictorial, marking his entree into the area of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>That we should refrain from making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to filth has been a insides shtick for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another special debouchment doting to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous odd issue, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Stare: "He’s too A-ok Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman over into the responses of a taste of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not simply tease a supportive answer to gay porn and the gay copulation represented but also relate feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the varying audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of manly porn viewers and the prime audience research project conducted by Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to fly apart stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, [http://imagicasnowpark.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=Www.erasmuseacadiz.com%2Findex.php%2F2018%2F02%2F07%2Fabierto-plazo-de-solicitud-de-movilidades-para-el-curso-2018-2019%2F gay0Day] who they are and how they present to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664925885