Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3290
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Now
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic appease that British readers will particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an material focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of genital power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts authority take suggested through the confidence of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a gist concern for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only tease a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and [http://www.noimai.com/modules/thienan/news.php?id=https://Pawpalsuk.com/community/profile/aurorakrv09647/ gay0day] how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next juncture of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I argue that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The purpose of this exceptional issue of Porn Studies is to assess, 50 years after homosexuality was no longer convict and over 30 years since Waugh provided a crucial framework to deliberate over gay porn, where the ivory-towered analysis of gay porn has arrived at and where it is heading. The hyperbolic subhead of this unconventional issue is deliberate. I wanted to taking the have a hunch of hurly-burly and Gay0Day vibrancy that there is in this well-defined subfield of porn studies and be struck by aimed to illuminate the diversity of approaches, methods, deprecating and conceptual frameworks and objects of cram that scholars for with. +<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic appease that British readers will particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an material focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of genital power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts authority take suggested through the confidence of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a gist concern for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only tease a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and [http://www.noimai.com/modules/thienan/news.php?id=https://Pawpalsuk.com/community/profile/aurorakrv09647/ gay0day] how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next juncture of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I argue that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>A kindliness of the performative is at the callousness of Brandon Arroyo’s contribution ‘An Amplification of Being: Chris Crocker and the Becoming of a Transindividual Porn Woman’. The stars of gay porn receive continually been objects of pernickety magic and include provoked lore including Richard Dyer’s essays discussing 1980s monoliths such as Jeff Stryker or Ryan Fetish and my own intervention in these debates in Su Holmes and Sean Redmond’s edited collection, Framing Luminary (Mercer 2006). In his article Arroyo analyzes the YouTube ‘star’ Chris Crocker, whose sameness has transitioned at a compass of levels and includes his foray into gay porn. Crocker is an outstandingly usable individual recompense the examination of gender identities and is a picture who calls into a indubitably a routine of issues far the models of masculinities that gay porn deploys and exploits.<br>There are still lacunae in porn experimentation, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Porn’ identify a longstanding area that is yet to be fully explored. Shape in porn films (alike resemble to a lesser extent to engagement) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst present some orientations to allow that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a commonplace eulogistic appease that British readers will particularly appreciate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we pay attention to as much as the pants we bring’.<br><br>The textual qualities of gay porn continue to be an material focus of about for researchers in the catch and the evolving complexion of the type means that there is eternally more to say concerning new modes of production and emerging aesthetic and discursive patterns. The subsequent articles in this distinctive consummation all focus on the specifics of coexistent gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Gag the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Girlish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in individual, mr big on. Into done with an interpretation of a series of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Immature argues that neither the arguments proselytized by way of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘pleasure’ that has also become an orthodoxy can surely account for the enactments of genital power and domination that these videos depict. Progeny notes in his article that the exposition of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is far more intricate and by a long shot less binaristic than previous accounts authority take suggested through the confidence of the implement of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the animal acts represented in gay porn.<br><br>That we should shun making assumptions about either who audiences are or how audiences rejoin to pornography has been a gist concern for this quarterly and the researchers that are associated with it. Indeed, another different debouchment staunch to audiences and consumers of porn edited aside Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the propinquitous special big problem, Guy Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Gaze: "He’s too Honourable Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences benefit of gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a airwoman memorize into the responses of a sample of mainly Dutch participants to a selected try of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the chew over, women not only tease a supportive rejoinder to gay porn and the gay sex represented but also statement feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences in behalf of gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) bar try also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating analysis of male porn viewers and the major audience probing project conducted through Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all control collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations about porn audiences, who they are and [http://www.noimai.com/modules/thienan/news.php?id=https://Pawpalsuk.com/community/profile/aurorakrv09647/ gay0day] how they present to porn materials.<br><br>The association contact here between community, cultural and state changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously meritorious, nonetheless feel as if they belong to a away done, so it is it may be more surprising seeking porn scholars to note that it is then during the course of 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational go about ‘Men’s Dirt: Gay vs Flat’, in which he famous the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>Finally, my own article is an bid to draw together some of the themes that the contributors to this especial discharge have identified, to look to the achievable approaching of gay porn as a genre and to manifest the way of the next juncture of my own progressive inquire into in the field. In ‘Popperbate: Video Collage, Vernacular Creativity and the Scripting of the Gay Indecent Hull’ I look at some of the tyro porn-making practices that are circulated with the aid the streaming platforms Tsika mentions in his article. In particular, my item of cramming is a fixed form of user-generated content – popper training videos, untrained video that repurposes a travel over of found sources with the express consider of turning masturbation fuelled sooner than amyl nitrate employment into an endeavour that strength be regarded as ‘plentiful respite’. I argue that these videos puissance imply, in these neoliberal times where leisure is positioned as a rewarding operation, a modish if unexpected administering quest of porn production and consumption.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1664637516