Examiner des modifications individuelles

Navigation du filtre antiabus (Accueil | Modifications récentes des filtres | Examiner les modifications précédentes | Journal antiabus)
Aller à : navigation, rechercher

Cette page vous permet d'examiner les variables générées pour une modification individuelle par le filtre antiabus et de les tester avec les filtres.

Variables générées pour cette modification

VariableValeur
Si la modification est marquée comme mineure ou non (minor_edit)
Nom du compte d’utilisateur (user_name)
KeithHudd225
Groupes (y compris implicites) dont l'utilisateur est membre (user_groups)
* user autoconfirmed
Si un utilisateur est ou non en cours de modification via l’interface mobile (user_mobile)
Numéro de la page (article_articleid)
3291
Espace de noms de la page (article_namespace)
0
Titre de la page (sans l'espace de noms) (article_text)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Titre complet de la page (article_prefixedtext)
Introduction: Gay Porn Promptly
Action (action)
edit
Résumé/motif de la modification (summary)
Ancien modèle de contenu (old_content_model)
wikitext
Nouveau modèle de contenu (new_content_model)
wikitext
Ancien texte de la page, avant la modification (old_wikitext)
The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn.
Nouveau texte de la page, après la modification (new_wikitext)
<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://www.loosandcompany.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=morrisofportobello.Co.uk%2Fgraduation-day%2F mouse click the following website page] Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by referral to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will-power very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At a still more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Diff unifié des changements faits lors de la modification (edit_diff)
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ -The textual qualities of gay porn keep on to be an mighty destination of observe in compensation researchers in the american football gridiron and Gay0Day the evolving nature of the variety means that there is eternally more to noise abroad about new modes of moulding and emerging aesthetic and windy patterns. The subsequent articles in this particular printing all heart on the specifics of contemporary gay porn as they are manifested in texts. In ‘Quip the Fag, or Tops and Bottoms, Persons and Things’, Damon Boyish tackles the textuality of porn, and coexistent gay porn in isolated, head on. From head to foot an division of a grade of up to date French materials and the website Wisecrack the Fag, Teenaged argues that neither the arguments proselytized by means of anti-porn feminism nor the rubric of ‘entertainment’ that has also behove an orthodoxy can surely account in return the enactments of sexual power and domination that these videos depict. Young notes in his article that the bust of ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’ which gay porn routinely deploys is by a long chalk everywhere more complicated and great less binaristic than one-time accounts might procure suggested from one end to the other the confidence of the device of the camera. Young’s article brilliantly reminds readers of the staged and performed quality of the propagative acts represented in gay porn. +<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://www.loosandcompany.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=morrisofportobello.Co.uk%2Fgraduation-day%2F mouse click the following website page] Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by referral to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will-power very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At a still more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Lignes ajoutées lors de la modification (added_lines)
<br>The year 2017 marks a woman that without hyperbole can be described as a pivotal in compensation gay men in the United Kingdom. It is under 50 years since the introduction of the Sex Offences Accomplishment of 1967, legislation that initially single applied in England and Wales, which led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in the Amalgamated Kingdom. Internationally, 1967 was an important year for gay men too. In Canada, [http://www.loosandcompany.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=morrisofportobello.Co.uk%2Fgraduation-day%2F mouse click the following website page] Justice Envoy Pierre Trudeau introduced legislation that was to happen in the decriminalization of homosexuality a year later. In the USA, the fashionable shameful telly documentary The Homosexuals (1967) was sow on CBS and Marlon Brando, by means of this apex a grave Hollywood star, was to against a repressed invert in John Huston’s (1967) Reflections in a Yellowish Eye. Also, Wainwright Churchill’s (1967) Lesbian Behavior Centre of Males: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Species Probe was first published in 1967, a engage that argued by referral to factual and cultural precedent for the acceptance of homosexuality. In September 1967, tersely before he was to become people of Andy Warhol’s superstars, a 19-year-old Joe Dallesandro appeared in the September issue of Physique Graphic, marking his entree into the world of show-business via gay porn’s backdoor.<br><br>There are still lacunae in porn analyse, and Sharif Mowlabocus and Andy Medhurst in ‘Six Propositions of the Sonics of Gay Obscenity’ identify a longstanding область that is in spite of to be fully explored. Look in porn films (compare favourably with to a lesser space to bringing off) remains under-researched and Mowlabocus and Medhurst advance some orientations to tolerate that avenue to be opened up, noting – with a regular good appease that British readers will-power very rate – that gay porn ‘relies on the pants we heed as much as the pants we see’.<br><br>Stephen Maddison’s article ‘Comradeship of Cock? Gay Porn and the Entrepreneurial Voyeur’ takes up divers of the narrative themes that Waugh has identified, and his intervention can be understood both as a response to Waugh’s earlier essay as well as his own perceptive appraisal of 30 years of inspect into gay porn. Maddison has previously written very astutely give the corroding of a idiosyncratic gay savoir faire and the lackey political implications of gay assimilation. In this article he positively again draws our acclaim to David Halperin’s (2014) recently мейд excellence between a gay individuality associated with capitalism, commodification and assimilation and a gay subjectivity that offers the likelihood of dissidence. Maddison engages critically with the suggestion that diverse others have мейд to the centrality of porn to gay culture and interrogates this representation including the lens of neoliberalism. In his article he looks at microblogging Tumblr sites that spotlight pornographic satisfied which he sees as acting as a purlieus of a distinctively ‘gay’ and thereby consciously subversive gay culture.<br><br>The connection here between societal, cultural and political changes and developments in gay porn is not a trivial one. These events, whilst variously historic, nonetheless climate as if they associated to a distant done, so it is perchance more surprising for porn scholars to note that it is now during 30 years since Thomas Waugh wrote the foundational try ‘Men’s Smut: Gay vs Straight’, in which he acclaimed the centrality of homoeroticism to gay culture:<br><br>At a still more physical constant it is also 20 years since I enrolled as a PhD student, researching the iconography of gay porn, funded via the British Arts and Humanities Scrutinization Stay and inspired before the work of scholars such as Waugh and Dyer (1985, 2002). This was the point at which my scholastic career properly began and a probing track was plotted that has led to the brochure, this year, of my own paper, Gay Dirt: Representations of Sexuality and Masculinity (Mercer 2016). Porn matters as a cultural phenomenon, and it uniquely matters to gay men. It mattered in the 1960s when Joe Dallesandro appeared undressed in the pages of Physique Clear, it mattered in the 1980s enough against Waugh to make a invalid recompense its interpretation, it mattered in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS turning-point and it matters now.<br><br>That we should keep off making assumptions here either who audiences are or how audiences respond to erotica has been a insides concern representing this daily and the researchers that are associated with it. Of course, another different debouchment enthusiastic to audiences and consumers of porn edited close to Sharif Mowlabocus and Rachel Wood in 2015 took this position as a starting point. In the present unconventional climax, Cat Ramsay contributes ‘Gays in the Girls’ Over: "He’s too Good Looking!"’, which considers female heterosexual audiences in compensation gay porn. Ramsay’s article emerges from a conductor think over into the responses of a representational of mainly Dutch participants to a selected swatch of gay porn materials. The article argues that, based on the findings of the reflect on, women not simply have a complete response to gay porn and the gay bonking represented but also report feelings of empathy. Ramsay’s article acts as a contribution to an emergent publicity on the diversified audiences for gay porn that includes Lucy Neville’s (2015) prime endeavour also on female consumption of gay porn, Florian Voros’ (2015) equally fascinating breakdown of male porn viewers and the crucial audience fact-finding venture conducted not later than Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, and Martin Barker (2011), and which all accomplishment collectively to cool stereotypes and generalizations forth porn audiences, who they are and how they relate to porn materials.<br>
Horodatage Unix de la modification (timestamp)
1663391472